Video source Open on YouTube

Old Paths Christian History Conference

John Weaver | YouTube

Lecture MetadataDetails
SpeakerJohn Weaver
SourceYouTube
Media IDHx5PvPLdDNk
SubjectFamily Government
CourseThe Christian Family: Children, Fatherhood, and Generational Faithfulness: The World And Times Of Jesse James
GenreSermon
Date2023-10-27
Dictation Name
BookBook 028: The Christian Family: Children, Fatherhood, and Generational Faithfulness — Chapter 15
Source Timed Segments340

Synopsis: This conference session focuses on the biblical foundations of Christian community, emphasizing the necessity of longsuffering, unity, and shared doctrine for sustaining fellowship among believers. Speakers explore the fruit of the Spirit, the distinction between unity and uniformity, the role of God's law in reconstructing society, and the practical implications of living in close proximity. The session concludes with a call to prepare for future hardships through biblical home defense and intentional community building.


Formatted Transcript

Introduction to Longsuffering

John Weaver introduces the fruit of the Spirit, focusing on longsuffering as 'long-allowing' rather than long pain, and its essential role in biblical community.

Galatians 5, verses 22 and 23, before Brother Cliff comes up. I hope I'm not stealing some fire from him. Galatians 5, verses 22 and 23.

Galatians 5:22, "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance. Against such there is no law." I'd like to look at this word "longsuffering" just for a moment. Now to us, no matter who we are or what we're doing, the word "suffer" is automatically equated with pain. Suffering equals hurt, pain. No matter how we slice it, the word is ingrained into us. But in Scripture, Christ said, "Suffer the little children to come unto me." It was not to, say, pain the little children or hurt them to come unto me, but rather to allow the children to come to our Lord. So longsuffering in the context of Scripture, within the Old English, ought not mean long pain or long hurting, but rather, perhaps, long allowing—allowing ourselves to be inconvenienced for the sake of another, a brother or a sister. Long-allowing. It's allowing for patience to have her perfect work, even when we are perhaps mildly wronged in some way. Not necessarily sinned against, but just mildly wronged. We are to be long-suffering. We can allow with love. Long-suffering is a pillar of biblical community. If not, the community will not last. Folks will instantly be at each other's throats, and it will disband, dissolve, and there will be no bond without proper biblical long-suffering. And again, it's a fruit of the Spirit. We just saw it, and we're called to be long-suffering anyway.

Practical Example of Longsuffering

Weaver illustrates longsuffering with a hypothetical scenario involving a neighbor's son mowing grass and accidentally damaging bean plants, urging forbearance over offense.

And our two lawns were on the property line. And his son gets on his zero-turn, and because of the terrain and a tree that's there, with the embankment the way a zero-turn is, in order to make that property line, he needs to actually swing onto my yard for a couple of feet in order to get around that tree, and then he gets right back into Brother Stan's yard and continues mowing. Well, in fact, he's crossed the line. He's in my yard for a few feet, and he's mowed my grass. And do you know why he goes around that tree? Because if he didn't, he'd have to use a hand trimmer. So his son over there, he's lazy. I know he is. And he takes that zero-turn and he makes a swoop around that tree into my land to mow that grass just so he doesn't have to use a trimmer.

Now you can see I'm having to conjure up an offense to it. I'm being blessed. He's mowing my grass for free as he swoops in. I'm having to create, I'm having to pretend I'm hurt in some way, that I'm so offended that his son would use their zero-turn to mow my grass. Well, let's change it up. Let's say his grass is on the property line.

But I've got an acre garden of beans that have come in so beautifully this year. And in making that swooping pass, he kills three of my bean plants. I've got 3,000 bean plants in that acre. And Brother Weaver will preach to you, there's violations here in Scripture. There's trespass. And now that he's killed my beans, there's theft. That boy stole my beans, and I'm so offended. Or can I be long-suffering? It's obvious he's not malicious.

He needs to make that cut into the land because of the way the tree is, the way the bank is. He means no harm. What's the cost of the three bean plants? It's nothing. I'm really not being offended unless I make it that I'm so hurt. So I can be long-suffering with a fine young man who is obeying his father in the first place. When his dad tells him to mow the lawn, he obeys. I can be long-suffering, seeing that it's easier just to come around that tree than to make him go around the other way. And so I can be long-suffering, or else I can let this fester. And guess what? I'm not going to him one-on-one. I'm telling everybody else I see first about what his boy did, and I can cut the community into pieces. I can cut the church up into pieces, and we can all get to fighting over a couple of feet of lawn or a couple of bean plants. Or else just say, it's no problem.

Brother, be blessed in coming into my yard. Take your swoop. Take out a couple of plants. No problem. There's no offense here. There was, in fact, loss of beans. But that's love. That's charity. That's mercy. It's long-suffering. But these are the things. If we live that close, we'll find anything to pick each other apart. As soon as we do, it's the sin nature within us. Jealousies, envying, strife. But a fruit of the Spirit is long-suffering. So we can allow in love.

Unity vs. Uniformity

Cliff Christman distinguishes unity from uniformity, using Psalm 133 to show that biblical unity allows diversity while sharing common faith and purpose.

You know what it said? It said unity, didn't it? Unity is not uniformity. It doesn't say we have to all look alike, walk alike, talk alike. It's unity. It is like the precious ointment upon the head that ran down upon the beard, even Aaron's beard, that went down to the skirts of his garments; as the dew of Hermon, and as the dew that descended upon the mountains of Zion: for there the Lord commanded the blessing, even life forevermore. Let's go to the Lord in prayer.

Independent Churches and Dominion

Christman discusses the drift toward humanistic kingship in churches and society, advocating for decentralized, localized authority based on God's law.

So the thing is, if I can create a problem among those around me and get them fighting each other rather than fighting me, why, I've won, right? And so that's what Satan has done in many ways. He's caused many of us in a whole lot of different arenas to basically just fight each other. And we all get into this difficult situation. And I think a lot of that has to do with the way we have drifted theologically, obviously, politically, and I don't think you can separate those two. Everything about us is theological. Our cultures, our religion externalized. So with that thought, my mind went over to Judges 10. Judges 10. If you'd like to turn there. We are in a very difficult time, to say the least. You don't need me to stand here and remind you of that. The time is getting more and more difficult as we go. And it's like that proverbial snowball going down the hill. It's moving faster and getting larger every moment. And it's hard to imagine where it is.

Now, I'm just going to use this text to illustrate a few things. And I may come back to it, but I am going to end up in Ephesians 4, God willing. Judges 10 verses 1 through 5 and then over back over to chapter 12 verses 8 through 15 are like two book holders holding up a story in between of Jephthah. Jephthah was a man that was born of a harlot, the Gileadite, that was used to conquer the Ammonites even though he was cast out and even though his father's natural children had nothing to do with him. He was thrown to the side, so to speak, but he was a mighty and valiant man. And when Israel was threatened, they called upon him to come and take care of the enemy, and he did. He did. He won. But the thought I had here is this, is that what we see throughout much of the Book of Judges is a drift toward humanistic kingship.

And again, you might think this is moving more politically, but I suggest to you that it is moved religiously, or at least in the churches throughout our land. In other words, our churches have not become independent anymore, they're more denominational. They're filled with hierarchies and various things. And I realize we are not individuals that adhere to a convention or a group. We are independent. But I want to tell you, those groups are all over America, and they're part of the problem. They're part of the problem. Many professing Christians in this land are truly part of the problem, not the solution. I don't suggest that that's their desire, that's their motive or what they want to do. I suggest that many have just drifted into this in more ways than one.

And so in Judges we see a drift toward humanistic kingship. We understand what happened in 1 Samuel 8 when they desired a king. Samuel was told of God to let him know what that king was going to do, what that king was going to be. And what happened? That king was going to take, take, take, take. And that's exactly what the federal government does to us today. They take, take, take. But that's also what denominations do to many churches today. They take, take, take, and then dictate what they're going to do and say. And so instead of being independent voices across this land and men and women to stand on their own two feet, stand upon the Word of God, we are so—we're more worried about what's happening in the big picture and—

Then we stop and we run with that assumption that somebody else is saying something, somebody else is doing something, and somebody else died a long time ago. It's a shame. Now, these are the minor judges' verses, chapter 10, verse 1: "And after Abimelech there arose to defend Israel Tola the son of Puah, the son of Dodo, a man of Issachar; and he dwelt in Shamir in mount Ephraim. And he judged Israel twenty and three years, and died, and was buried in Shamir. And after him arose Jair, a Gileadite, and judged Israel twenty and two years. And he had thirty sons that rode on thirty ass colts, and they had thirty cities, which are called Havoth Jair unto this day, which are in the land of Gilead. And Jair died, and was buried in..."

I looked away and missed it. Buried in... Come on. Now, as we think about this, you go back over to chapter 12, you're going to see the other end of that bookend, so to speak, and verse 8: "And after him Ibzan of Bethlehem judged Israel. And he had thirty sons, and thirty daughters, whom he sent abroad, and took in thirty daughters from abroad for his sons. And he judged Israel seven years. Then died Ibzan, and was buried at Bethlehem. And after him Elon the Zebulunite judged Israel; and he judged Israel ten years. And Elon the Zebulunite died, and was buried in Aijalon in the country of Zebulun."

Scripture Reading — Judges 12:8-15
"And after him Abdon the son of Hillel, a Pirathonite, judged Israel. And he had forty sons and thirty nephews that rode on threescore and ten ass colts: and he judged Israel eight years. And Abdon the son of Hillel the Pirathonite died, and was buried in Pirathon in the land of Ephraim, in the mount of the Amalekites."

Now, these minor judges, so to speak, I think were very important in many ways, but over the years of church history, we can look at the book of Judges as being something that served God's people in many ways, and I think many great ways. I think that was some of the inspiration among the Reformation. And boy, do we need a Reformation today in more ways than one. At least men with the same kind of grit of the Reformation.

We lack that in America. One of the problems we have in our nation is the lack of manhood. We've lost it in many cases. And that is a plague in more ways than one. The time of Reformation was an age of mounting tyranny, and Roman Catholicism had married a state claiming absolutism, along with many of the monarchs who made claims to divine rights. And as we read the book of Judges, it provided answers and ammunition against those kind of trends. And three things proved to be a tremendous influence during those times. The book of Judges revealed their problems as moral and spiritual. It was a moral and spiritual disloyalty to Christ. And therefore they stressed that unless the Levites, the preachers, got busy and reformed the church, social conditions would only go from bad to worse. And listen, many of the preachers in our land today are doing nothing but lullabying the people to sleep. The pipers are leading them on a broad road to destruction in more ways than one. As has already been said today, there is more caring about filling the pews up and the offering plates so that we can take care of their little corporations rather than standing on the one true and living God, the words of the one true and living God.

Theonomy and Christian Reconstruction

Weaver introduces theonomy and Christian reconstruction as unifying doctrines, urging study of Greg Bahnsen and R.J. Rushdoony to rebuild society biblically.

You can Google search them however you want to do it. Write two things down. The one being the term theonomy. Theonomy, T-H-E-O, Theos God, T-H-E-O, Nomi, N-O-M-Y, Law. Theonomy, the application of God's law today, that is to say, Old Testament law. There is a grand portion of Christianity today that rejects theonomy, that would reject the application of God's law, Old Testament, to society today. So if you would, if you're not familiar with the term, theonomy, what would unite us? What would unite these particular churches, independent though we be, is a doctrine of theonomy.

Both from Brother Allen, Brother Cliff, Brother Stan, and Brother Weaver. You could ask around the county, Ben Hill, Coffey, wherever you have friends in churches, if they'd be a theonomic-minded pastor or congregation. Some might not even have heard the term. Don't blame them for that. But understand that many and most churches reject the law of God in our lives. After all, we live under grace. We're under grace, not under law, is the common line.

So if you want to know what unites us and helps bring us together, it is the doctrine, the understanding of theonomy. The second thing I would ask you to write down, to look up, on theonomy, Greg Bahnsen. If you've heard of the author, he's passed away, Greg Bahnsen. B-A-H-N-S-E-N. Thank you. S-E-N. B-A-H-N-S-E-N. Greg Bahnsen.

I've bought his books off of Amazon. Look them up. Greg Bahnsen on theonomy and the second term, Christian Reconstruction. That is to say, how to reconstruct. We heard about reconstruction after the war between the states, not necessarily in a good way. But we would understand we need to reconstruct society to be in line with the principles of Scripture. Christian Reconstruction. We get an understanding of the Word of God through the ministry of R.J. Rushdoony. If you have not purchased books by R.J. Rushdoony, see your pastor. See Brother Weaver on which titles of the books to get, so that you can read them to understand Christian Reconstruction. Each one of these pastors and these churches understand, and we come together knowing we need to rebuild society as it's being torn down.

What if we had a revival, but didn't know how to keep it? We need to understand how to restructure society by the Word of God that we can see it go generations, or else we'll just lose it in a generation. So your homework from today is theonomy and Christian reconstruction. Wonderful.

Biblical Home Defense

Weaver presents a scenario of a 12-year-old attacker to stress the need for theological preparedness in self-defense, announcing a future conference on the topic.

And he starts taking pot shots to kill the woman he sees with the food. Now, unfortunately, he's a bad shot. I see from across the yard dirt kicking up. And I'm saying, son, whoever you are, kid, stop shooting. Stop. You're trying to kill my wife. Now, if I have a weapon and he is trying to kill my wife and he hears me yelling, so he turns to me, starts taking pot shots at me with this .22.

What do I have to do? Many people don't want to think about the answer to this question. What do I do? Many people were just like, that is so hard. I don't want to think about it. You know, we're in 2023. We're getting into 2024. Life will go on just as we know it. There's no need for this kind of chaos, these ideas of apocalypse, or something like that.

If you can't bear the thought of preparing your mind, of having a theology ready, to say, this young man, young as he be, is a threat to my life. He has attempted to kill her and by God's grace he's failed. But I need to stop him. And I'm across the yard. I can't tackle him. He's now shooting at me. What do I do as a man of God? I've got to kill him. I've got to stop him. I don't know him. He's come as the thief. He's come as a murderer. And he's 12 years old. And I have to stop him. And if I wasn't already ready in my mind to do it, I might stop. I might be in analysis paralysis. What do I do? But the theology that I already know, my heart's prepared.

I mean him no malice. But I've got to stop him. And I'm going to have to shoot, and I'm going to have to kill a 12-year-old boy because he's seeking to murder my wife, murder myself, and the rest of my children. Now that is a reasonable scenario when the bad times come. Think of any war in Iraq. Over in the Middle East, terrible things happen in war. And yet theology would give us a clear, crystal answer, as unpleasant as it might be. And we would pray that day never comes. But are you ready? Are you aware that decisions will need to be made? Decisions will need to be made based on the principles of the Word of God you have to already ingrain.

Doctrine as Foundation for Community

John Weaver expounds Acts 2:42, showing that doctrine determines duty, fellowship, conduct, patience, and defense, forming the basis for a working community.

Did he ever preach at Central Baptist Church in Waycross? All right. So, Brother Gordon, there's your answer. Brother Gordon knew him as well. So that's good. Well, amen. Well, if you would open your Bibles, if you would please, to the book of Acts chapter 2. Acts chapter 2.

Now, I want to just try to tie together a number of things that's been said today. And since this has been really on community, I'm going to be dealing with a community that will work. So if you look in Acts chapter 2, beginning there with verse 41, and let me just read these, Acts 2 verse 41. Then they that gladly received his word were baptized, and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. And fear came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. And all that believed were together, and had all things common; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. Notice, if you would please, when Brother Peacock spoke first thing this morning, he was actually dealing with how the Lord has worked in this church and in this community. And then, of course, Brother Stan dealt with the families in community. And then, of course, our dear Brother Cliff has dealt also with dominion and church to church and what's going on. Let me point out to begin with, communities are no better than the individuals and the families in them.

And if you do not have individuals that are right and families that are right, you're not going to have a right community, that is for sure. I want to just mention very quickly by way of introduction some of the failed communities. I'm not going to spend much time upon these. Many of these you have never heard about and probably are not even interested in hearing about them.

But they are valuable in the sense that you know what will fail and what will not work. In fact, most of these were just pure socialistic experiments. Some of them were out-and-out communism. A fool's dream in socialism is this: They know that socialism does not work, that it's going to fail. But the fool's dream is, well, they just haven't tried my brand of socialism. And mine is going to work where everyone else's fails. I never will forget when I was in college in Greenville, South Carolina. I forget exactly how many, but around 25 or 30 bank robberies happened while I was in school. And no, it wasn't me. About 25 or 30 of them happened, and not one ever got out of the city limits of Greenville, South Carolina. Not one robber ever made it out of the city limits. Why in the world would anyone continue to rob a bank when they have that kind of record, when nobody ever got out of the city limits?

Because every criminal thought the other criminals were stupid, but they had it right, and they're not going to get caught. They're exceptions. Well, that's the way socialism works as well. So near the mid-19th century, there were dozens of men and women in North America and in Europe who were trying these communities with what they call looking for social progress. One of those communities was Brook Farm, started by George Ripley. He was a humanist. He was a humanitarian, so to speak. But he was also a member of the Transcendentalist Club. And so he began this transcendental community. And one of the leading principles of the Transcendentalists was mind over matter. They thought the supremacy of the mind was that which really... He began this little community in 1841 on 200 acres near Boston, Massachusetts. And the truth of the matter is, it was a failure because one of their leading principles was this—I'm reading from the Articles of Association—was to substitute a system of brotherly cooperation for one of selfish competition.

So what they're saying is we're not going to be independent workers. We're not going to do it. We're just going to work together. And everybody's going to get a little bit of whatever we do. Guess what? If I want to get a little bit of everything that everybody else does, why should I really exert myself at all? Why should I not just sit back and let you exert yourself? You see, the truth of the matter is socialism does not work. And this group just happened to exist for a few years.

There was also an equality colony, which was an attempt to create a socialistic utopia in Washington State. It began in 1897, and by 1907, it was extinct. Socialism always fails. There was the New Harmony community, also a utopian community started by Robert Owen. He began it in 1824, and by 1829, it was over, lasted five years. And then Fruitlands. Fruitlands, you talk about a fruit group. This was a group. They were a weird community.

They were a vegetarian settlement, and they were anarchists. They banned the eating of meat and using of animal products whatsoever. In fact, they could not even use animals in their farm work. And they were reduced to planting anything, or let me say this again, they were reduced to planting only those things which would not disturb the earthworms. Consequently, the winter of 1843 did not sit well with them because they didn't have enough to eat. And so it didn't last a year. They just simply left the plantation, so to speak. Warren Luke had lived for years in Cahuilla, California. Cahuilla was begun as a socialistic experiment, and of course it was begun in the 1880s, and by 1892 it was over. Now the town Cahuilla continues to exist, but the socialistic colony disappeared, because socialism just simply does not work.

Now, I mentioned one word already. In fact, I mentioned both words. And I want to just stop and give you a good definition. Because you hear people talk about a socialistic utopia or a communistic utopia. Let me just say this very bluntly. There's no such thing as a utopia. Okay? The word utopia, our English word, comes from two Greek words, ou topos. Ou topos is where we get our word utopia.

Ou happens to be a negative, it means no. Topos is the word that means place. The word utopia means no place. In other words, it doesn't exist. It's a figment of the imagination. It's only in the dreams of man. It is God who determines reality and not man. And so anytime you hear the word utopia, you just got to remember that's a figment of someone's imagination. The second word you've heard me use, and everybody else has used today, is the word community. We use that word very loosely. We think we understand what it means, but in reality we probably do not.

Let me give you a good definition. Here it is. A social group of any size, whose members reside in a specific locality, share government, and often have a common cultural and historical heritage. Now, when you stop and think about this, you and I can comprehend a group of people. We can comprehend them residing in a specific locality. We can even comprehend them sharing government. But let me tell you something, just because you live in a specific locality and just because you share government and just because you have people around you does not mean that you are a community. Because oftentimes we overlook this latter part: and have a common cultural and historical heritage.

Now let me say something, you're going to hear me say this several times. Where there is no commonality, there is no community. Now here's another definition of community, I want you to listen carefully. A group of men or women leading a common life according to a rule. Well, I hope you understand exactly what Warren Lusk was talking about when we were talking about God's law. Because God's law is the rule for our life. It is our standard. And if we're living in a Christian community—and by the way, you do not have to be on the same property to have a real Christian community. You can be neighbors. You can have individual property rights, that is for sure. But even in a church, a church is supposed to be a Christian community. When you talk about a community, think, if you would please, about Israel. Israel was divided into 12 tribes. But not only those 12 tribes, they were also divided into families and they were also divided into clans. And so you had one group and they were not necessarily living right next to each other. Every tribe had its individual property.

But they all cooperated and worked together. So, you can have people grouped in a specific locality, you can have people sharing government, but if they do not have a common faith, if they do not have a common culture, if they do not have a common heritage, there's not going to be any real community. And that is a fact that most people have never really understood this principle. Because you cannot have a community unless people begin to think and believe alike.

So what we have today is this. We have a conglomeration of churches, a conglomeration of cultures, faiths, heritages, ethnicities, ideologies, and all of these things determine our political, religious, and economic views. There cannot possibly be any real community today with such major divisions. What is happening, Brother Cliff has already touched upon, there is separation and division happening everywhere. You look at the Muslims that have come into this country. The Muslims are now pushing as hard as they can for Sharia law. Guess what? The atheists are pushing as hard as they can to kick God and any Christianity out of life.

And then, of course, then there are Christians who are fighting each other because they want their little specific denomination or their little specific sect to be predominant. And by the way, I could have used the word preeminent. Did you know that the word preeminence only occurs twice in the New Testament? Did you know that? The first time it occurs is found in the Book of Colossians chapter 1 in reference to Jesus Christ, that in all things he might have the preeminence. The second time it's used is in 3 John, when he's talking about Diotrephes, who loves to have the preeminence, and he won't let people in the church. And he kicks the apostles out. In other words, he would take the place of Jesus Christ. And that's exactly what is happening today. In other words, if it's not going to benefit me, if it's not going to benefit my church, if it's not going to benefit my ministry, then I'm not interested in it. That's the attitude. And that's not ministry at all. That's not ministry at all.

So the truth of the matter is there is a community that actually works. And that community, of course, is given to us as an example, the church. The Church of Jesus Christ is to be a community of the saints. Likewise, our physical communities must also hold to and possess the biblical principles of our Lord Jesus Christ. Because really and truly only God can give community. Only God can give us a commonality of faith. And only God has given us a commonality in heritage and culture as well.

Now in Acts chapter 2 and verse 42 is where I want to begin. How would you look at it? The Bible said that they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship and in breaking of bread and in prayers. So I'm going to give you several important points. And here's the very first one. The first important truth concerning community, whether it is a church or a community of individuals, is doctrine. Is doctrine. Notice if you would, how they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine. In other words, they continued in the doctrine, in the teaching that the apostles taught, who received their teaching from the Lord Jesus Christ himself. Why in the world is doctrine so important? Well, let me give you several reasons. First of all, doctrine determines our duty. Do you realize it's impossible to know your duty without doctrine? You do not even know how to act without duty. Our duty is based upon our doctrine. How do we know how to live? How do we know how to work? How do we know how to help?

How do we know how to get along with each other? How in the world do we need and know how to love each other without doctrine? Doctrine teaches us that which is right, that which is agreeable with God, that which pleases God, and that which honors God. You cannot know your duty without doctrine. The Bible says in the book of Micah, chapter 6 and verse 8, "He has shown thee, O man, what is good, and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God." The word of God tells you in the book of Ecclesiastes chapter 12 and verse 13, "Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep his commandments. This is the whole duty of man." If you don't know God's law, if you don't know God's word, if you don't know doctrine, you have no idea what your duty is. You can't perform it. In the book of Romans chapter 15 and verse 27, the Apostle Paul wrote, "It hath pleased them verily, and their debtors they are.

For if the Gentiles have been made partakers of their spiritual things, their duty is to minister them in material or earthly things." Notice if you would, duty is based upon doctrine. It is impossible to live right unless you believe right. It is impossible to do your duty or even know your duty without doctrine. You remember what the Bible says in Proverbs chapter 23 and verse 7 in regards to man? "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he." That's why the Bible says in Proverbs 4 verse 23, "Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life." And then our Lord said it like this in the book of Matthew chapter 15 and verse 19, "For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies." Everything that we do comes out of the heart. And the heart in Scripture is the mind. You cannot move, you cannot act without thinking. And our Lord said, if our thinking is wrong, then our actions are going to be wrong.

If our actions are going to be right, that means our thinking must be right, our doctrine must be right, so that we will know how to act. Let me show you. I want you to look in your Bibles, if you would, to the book of Romans chapter 15. Romans chapter 15. And let's read the first eight verses. Look at this passage. Romans 15. Just to show you that doctrine determines our duty. What's this? He said in Romans 15 in verse 1, "We then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves. Let every one of us please his neighbor for his good to edification.

For even Christ pleased not himself, but as it is written, 'The reproaches of them that reproach thee fell on me.' For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the Scripture might have hope." Now the God of patience and consolation grant you, watch this, to be like-minded one toward another according to Christ Jesus, that you may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Wherefore receive ye one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God. Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers.

Now, note if you would please, in order to do your duty in life according to this passage, you must understand what it means not to please yourself. You must understand what it means to edify one another. You must understand what it means to be like-minded. You must understand what it means to think the same thing and to say the same thing. And you must understand what it means to receive one another, even as Christ received us. In other words, this passage basically teaches us as Christians that we're to have one mind, that is the mind of Jesus Christ. We're to have one mouth, that is we're to say the same thing. We're to have one motive, and that is we're to glorify God the Father. And we're to have one mission, and that is to confirm the promises that God has given according to the person and work of Jesus Christ and what he has accomplished.

So, a common doctrine does not mean that everyone must agree on everything in detail. However, it does mean that everyone does agree on the fundamentals of Scripture, and we hold the Word of God to be the inspired, inerrant, infallible Word of God. We hold to the fact and reality that Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone is salvation. So we not only believe in the inspiration and authority and infallibility of the Scripture, we also believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, but we must also have and possess a teachable spirit. So the believers then in the early church, they received the doctrine of the apostles. They retained it. They believed it. They understood it. They applied it.

The Necessity of Physical Proximity

Weaver emphasizes the geographical aspect of community, warning that without fuel and vehicles, believers must be within walking distance to aid one another.

But there is a physicality, there is a necessity to be near. And when we talk about near, a few miles away, a few acres away, with vehicles that run on gas, it is nothing for me if I heard Brother Weaver broke his leg. He'd call me on his cell phone, and I could be at his property. If I took it fast, I'd be there in 20 minutes. In the Pioneer days, as we call them, or in Little House on the Prairie days, it would take him hours to send word to go get the doctor to come back to help him. Now it's a two-second phone call and a quick 15-minute drive. And I'm across town, I'm across the county, because I have a vehicle that runs on fuel. If we can say, if we can see through wisdom that the Lord has given us, there will come a day when there is no fuel, when there is no electricity, when there is no cell service. How close do I need to be to Brother Weaver that if he were to break his leg, he could get word to me and I'd be able to assist him? Well, I need to be within a mile or two, within an acre or two to be able to come to his aid.

There is a physical restraint to truly being in community. We have the affluence, the ability to drive. We have folks come here from the coast. We have folks driving hours to get here. But if we take out the equation of vehicles and fuel, we are back to how far can you walk to help someone? Can you walk from here to 206? Highway 206? Can you walk from here to 268? Can you walk from here to Broxton? How long does it take to walk to get to Douglas? What's a Fitzgerald walk from here? It would take all day. If I set out for Brother Weaver's land, I'd have a backpack and I'd set out and it would take all day to get from here to Brother Weaver's land. It would take him a day if he needed my help. It would take a day for someone and a messenger that he sent out. It would take him a day to get to me to send word that Brother Weaver needed help and an entire day for me to even get back if I started instantly.

There is inherently the need to be close, physically, if we take out the equation of vehicles and fuel. And I believe anyone here understands that that day is soon coming upon us. If we think about the night our Lord was born, the shepherds in the hills, they said, let us now go even unto Bethlehem and see this thing. How far away was that field they were watching their flocks? Think about Broxton. Was it in Broxton? That's a good hour and a half walk. It must have been close. It wasn't miles and miles. We must be close. We can think of the pioneer days when if you was on the corner of your land, you could about holler over across the ravine to the other farm and get word. They would walk to the corner of their land, holler farther, and it would go from farm to farm.

Brother Weaver just talked about illumination. If the Lord's laid it on your heart to be close, it takes giving up what things you have on your property. Everybody here lives in a house, I know that. Some in Douglas, some farther, some way farther. But what are you willing to give up to be close? Not just theologically, oh yes, but physically, if you're willing to say, there will come a time when we are reduced to foot travel. Where are you and who can you walk to with foot travel?

Where should you be when you lose your fuel? You better be where you hope to be and near who you hope to be near, even in the midnight hour. Don't wait that long. But if it gets there, you need to understand we're not going to be moving around if we lose fuel. And I hope I don't have to convince you of what that would take and how easy that would happen.

Family as the Core Community

Stan Clough stresses the family's role in rearing godly generations and exercising dominion, warning against passivity and worldly conformity.

And it's certainly not anything that can be dealt with in just one sermon. This is something that you could spend months and months on as you dealt with the biblical model of the family. But I wish to bring some of my thoughts this morning. And as I look, we see young couples, and then we see older folks. And I'm now in that second category, Brother Steve. I'm one of the older folks. That's right. You know what I'm talking about, don't you? When I first met Brother Alan, I didn't have all my children. We had some young children, and now I have grandchildren, one of those being here. So God has been mighty good to my wife and myself, our family.

I would like to share some things with you, though. The question is, what is the family community? What is the purpose of family? Why do we have family? Now, you can have family everywhere. You can hear those that come together to the church. You're different than most people. You're different than the vast majority of the world around us, because you've set aside a Saturday to come and to listen to men expound on the Word of God, to have fellowship together with other believers in Christ. So you're different than the vast, vast majority. I'll say that you are different even than many of those that are formal members of a church somewhere.

You see, there is a difference, and there is a small minority, and there always has been—a small, small minority of people that have a real, true desire to follow the biblical model of what God has set forth in His Word. The secular world is very unsure about what family is even all about. Do you realize that what was known for years as the nuclear family, that was terminology that came about, that the nuclear family, what is that, Brother Stan? The nuclear family is one man and one woman. We need to make sure of that. And then that they had children between themselves and they lived basically a very stable life depending on what era it was in, what decade it was in, but basically it was a family organization that was not all split up and mixed and mingled and this, that, and the other. And that is becoming such a rare thing, even today, and I'm not trying to be critical whatsoever, but even I would say within the church, we are seeing so many that don't even have a real understanding of what God's pattern is for the family.

Why is that, do you think? I think that it is because it is so easy not to address it. Because so many pastors are more concerned about filling pews than they are about preaching the Word. Because when you really get into the Word of God, so often what happens is you don't want to offend people. And nobody, none of us, want to offend anybody willingly. But folks, I'm going to tell you, if we are being true to the Word, it is not we that are doing the offending, I would say that it is the Holy Spirit. The secular world is completely unsure about what the purpose of the family is. They're more concerned, so often it would seem, with materialism, with permissiveness, with immaturity even in their children. I appreciate your children, Bartholomew, because I've watched them. I've watched them when you visited us. And it is refreshing to see children that can sit, and they don't have to be little statues, but they are, and all the young people that I've seen in here, they're polite, they're respectful.

And folks, that does not just happen. So we're not real concerned about what the secular world has to say because they have nothing good to say to us anyway. The truth is the secular world hates Christ and they hate Christians. We're more concerned about what the Christian family purpose is. And I would say this. I would say that the purpose of the Christian family, number one, is to rear godly future generations. Did you hear me? The purpose of the Christian family. It's not just for a man and a woman to marry. It's not just for you to go buy a house with a picket fence and have a bank account. There's nothing wrong with having that house and that picket fence and that bank account. But folks, our purpose is to raise godly future generations. And then the second purpose of the Christian family is for us to exercise dominion in our sphere of influence. What are you talking about our sphere of influence?

Well, I'm a business owner. I have my business. And I cannot run my business in the un-Christlike way and be biblical. That's right. Amen. Every person in this place, every person that will listen by way of video, every single one of you. Mama, you may be homeschooling your children, and praise God if you are. Or your child may go to a school, a Christian private school, and if they do, that's fine. But I'm telling you, it is our purpose as Christian men and Christian women that we are to exercise dominion wherever God has placed us.

In 1996, here's a shout out to your title here. I've never been assigned subjects to speak on very often, but he assigned these subjects and I appreciate it. I feel like you gave me the best one, okay? Best one, best time. But anyway, how did it go? It takes a village to raise a child? No, it takes a Christian family. In 1996, that Jezebel Hillary Clinton, she published a book entitled, "It Takes a Village to Raise a Child." Y'all are familiar with the title of that book.

I hope you have not read it. But basically, the thesis of that book is that the rearing of a—let me say, my daddy taught me this, Brother John. We don't raise children. You raise corn, you rear children. And y'all understand, you rear children. But the basic thesis of the book is that the rearing of children takes the collective effort of a village. That's what she was saying. And in essence, she was saying it becomes everybody else's responsibility if that child is going to grow up and become a successful adult.

Well, that is not what our Lord says. That is not what the Scriptures say. Because I'm going to tell you, a lot of people in the village of this world are wicked, wicked, wicked. They have come to the point where the government, they decide that they think that they own your children. We have seen this accelerated. And I won't go into all these details because I'm limited on time. But folks, I'm going to tell you, it is the parent's responsibility to rear the children. Do other people have influence? Absolutely they do. And some influence is good and some influence is bad.

And as parents, you better make a determination on which one it is. The vast majority of people, though, they have fallen prey to this unbiblical model. And what does that do? That forms out the responsibility of the family to others. Did you hear me? We have responsibility and we have to raise our children. We can't save our children. That is the work of God. But we can make that ground as fertile as we possibly can so that the Holy Spirit will come in and move on them and affectionately call them. Amen? I can tell you what, if you were letting them be subjected to wickedness all the time, they are much less apt to be sensitive to the Holy Spirit. Amen. We have this responsibility.

I look, I see two of my grandchildren right now. One's four and a half, and one's just turned a year. And it is those parents' responsibility, and by extension, their granddaddy that's got them right there, and their other grandparents. Yes, will we have influence? Yes, we will. Should we have influence? Yes, we should. But it is the family, the community of family that is going to answer to the Lord for the rearing of these children. God's plan has always been to accomplish dominion through the family. And you know, we see the family under extreme duress. We see so many familial problems that we—many have no inclination of even what the biblical model for family is.

If we were doing that long series this morning, we could go into all the different roles, and we would. We would go into the different roles of the family. We would talk about how important the role of the father is and the husband. You know, he needs to be the husband before he's the father. Amen? But you see, even the world doesn't even understand that. And what just blows my mind, I guess with social media, there's no secret that stays secret very long, is there? But we see people, and they're just proud as they can be, and they're having children out of wedlock, and calling on the name of the Lord in the next sentence. Oh my Lord.

Come on folks, y'all look at me like I'm crazy. We have forgotten what wickedness is. It is welcomed with open arms. People have no idea what the biblical model... You know what the biblical model for the husband and the father is? He is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. Did you know, men, that you were to be the role model for what your girls see when they look to marry someone? You're to be the role model for what your boys should be and want to aspire to grow up to be? Your boys, you know what they should be doing? Your boys should be saying, I want to be just like Daddy!

And if they're not, then what's wrong? I remember, I'm going to tell a short story. I was about five or six years old, and I was at the farm with my granddaddy. And he wasn't a large man, but he's the toughest man I've ever met in my life. And I remember this. I remember he was having some ponds dug, brother. And he was out there, and it was in the wintertime.

And he had heavy equipment out there. And I was about a five or six-year-old little boy. I may have been Jack's age. I'm not sure. And you know what? I was fascinated with that equipment. And I was fascinated with what my granddaddy was doing, building those ponds. And it was muddy, and he was putting out drain tile, and I was riding his way. And all I wanted to do, Brother Harold, was be like my granddaddy. That's all I wanted.

And so he finally, he took me down. It was in Douglas. He took me to an old hardware store called Alfred Lotz. And he bought me a pair of rubber boots. And let me tell you something, brothers and sisters. I got back out there on that job site and I put my dungarees, I took them down on those rubber boots and I stomped around like I was John Wayne. There wasn't any man bigger than I was at five years old. But you see, we got boys now, they don't even know if they're boys or not. Have mercy, they don't know what bathroom to go into. I tell you what, by the time a young man is 15 years old and it maybe should be younger, but by the time a young man is 15, that's exactly what he should be, is a young man and a young lady should be a young lady by that time. This period of time of adolescence and teenage years and acting like Peter Pan and can't grow up, God forbid that's not biblical.

And if you were talking about the earlier history of the country and everything, you look at what our forefathers did. I remember, I could go on and on, but I'm going to tell you something. I guarantee you, sir, I don't know you, but I know this, I know that when you were 15 years old, you weren't acting like no little boy. I almost guarantee you were carrying the load of a full grown man because that's what you were. We're raising our children to be immature. We're raising them to be more concerned about what the world thinks about them than what our Father above thinks about them. In Joshua 24, you're all familiar with this, and it's probably no surprise that I would read this Scripture. But in Joshua, if you would, turn there, Joshua 24, in verse 14, it says, "Now therefore, fear the Lord, and serve Him in sincerity and in truth, and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood and in Egypt, and serve ye the Lord." And then in verse 15 it says, "And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your father served, that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell."

Do you understand that we still have this choice today? We're either going to serve Jehovah God, or we're going to serve the gods of the Amorites—any pagan deity that there is, because those are the only two choices. Christ said, you're either for me or you are against me. Amen? And he says, "But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." Those are the types of definitive statements that we need to make. We need to declare in our heart and in our minds every day that me and my house, we're serving the Lord.

Closing Exhortation and Song

Weaver concludes with a call to desire community as a voluntary blessing, quoting a hymn and urging thanks to God for the harvest of the Spirit.

It's not demanded, but it's to be desired. But if we see a blessing in community, then we ought to seek that blessing. We have to follow that. And again, how does the Lord urge us to seek Him? To seek first His kingdom, and all these things will be added unto us. We are to seek His blessing. And what is needed extra from us? We say, okay, so we're supposed to be faithful to our families. Yes. We're supposed to be faithful to our churches as members, as participants. Yes. Well, what is needed to be part of a community? It's what you're supposed to be doing anyway.

Loving each other as ourselves. It simply becomes an extension of our godly life, serving others, loving others, as Christ would have us. So there's really nothing extra, no more burdensome theology, to be a part of a community for the grace of God. So we serve others. Think of the verse, "Do good and lend, hoping for nothing again, and your reward shall be great." What a blessing. When we are rubbing shoulders with fellow believers, we can do good to them. We can lend. If I know what the Lord has given me is extra that I can actually give to a brother, if I were to give it to Brother Stan, I just want to bless him with it.

I'm not going to hope for it again. I just want him to be blessed. Where did it come from anyway? The Lord gave me extra, and I can bless him with it. And he'll praise God for the blessing, for the help. When I need help, I would hope the brothers in the community would come to my aid. And I know you would. The Amish have this right. If we could say their theology stinks, but they've got this right. They help each other. They throw labor at each other, building their barns together. They give their cattle—a milk cow. If someone's lost a milk cow, here comes another one from the community, to be a blessing. And when they need, they're then blessed.

This is where we ought to be. There is a song, and I'd like to quote it. It's called "For the Fruit of All Creation." It's just very pretty. It's to the tune of "All Through the Night." Follow with me if you would. For the fruit of all creation, thanks be to God. Gifts bestowed on every nation, thanks be to God. For the plowing, sowing, reaping, silent growth while we are sleeping, future needs and earth's safekeeping, thanks be to God. Verse two: In the just reward of labor, God's will is done. In the help we give our neighbor, God's will is done. In our worldwide task of caring for the humble and despairing, in the harvest we are sharing, God's will is done. And verse three: For the harvest of the Spirit, thanks be to God. For the good we all inherit, thanks be to God. For the wonders that astound us, for the truth that still confound us, but most of all that love has found us, thanks be to God.

So so.


Study Guide

Major Themes

Longsuffering as Essential for Community

Summary: Longsuffering is redefined as 'long-allowing'—patiently bearing minor inconveniences for the sake of unity, a fruit of the Spirit necessary to prevent division.

Evidence: Weaver explains longsuffering as 'long allowing' and illustrates with the bean plant scenario, emphasizing that without it, community will dissolve.

Unity vs. Uniformity

Summary: Biblical unity does not require uniformity; it is a bond of peace rooted in shared doctrine, allowing diversity in practice while maintaining common faith.

Evidence: Christman states, 'Unity is not uniformity,' and cites Psalm 133, while Weaver notes differences in worship styles between cultures.

Theonomy and God's Law

Summary: The application of God's law (theonomy) is presented as the unifying doctrine for independent churches, essential for reconstructing society and resisting tyranny.

Evidence: Weaver introduces theonomy and Christian reconstruction, recommending Bahnsen and Rushdoony, and contrasts it with antinomian views.

Doctrine Determines Duty and Conduct

Summary: Right doctrine leads to right duty, fellowship, and conduct; without common doctrine, there can be no true community or patience with one another.

Evidence: Weaver expounds Acts 2:42, showing that doctrine teaches how to love, work, and bear with others, and that illumination by the Spirit fosters patience.

Physical Proximity and Preparedness

Summary: True community requires geographical nearness, especially in anticipation of societal collapse; believers must be within walking distance to help each other.

Evidence: Weaver argues that without fuel, aid must come by foot, and urges relocation if necessary, tying it to the upcoming biblical home defense conference.

Family as the Foundation of Community

Summary: The Christian family is the primary sphere for rearing godly generations and exercising dominion; parents must actively disciple children and resist worldly influences.

Evidence: Clough emphasizes Joshua 24:15, warns of a lost generation in Judges 2, and urges inspection of the family's spiritual foundation.

Voluntary Community as a Blessing

Summary: Community is not commanded but desired; it flows from loving one's neighbor and extends the blessings of church and family through mutual service.

Evidence: Weaver notes that community is 'volunteer' and 'comes from seeking a blessing beyond mere obedience,' citing Hebrews 10:25 and the Amish example.

Key Arguments

Longsuffering prevents community breakdown

Summary: Without longsuffering, minor offenses will fester and destroy relationships; believers must choose to overlook trivial wrongs for the sake of unity.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'I can cut the community into pieces... over a couple of bean plants. Or else just say, it's no problem.'

Denominationalism mirrors humanistic kingship

Summary: The drift toward centralized church authority parallels Israel's desire for a king, leading to tyranny and loss of local independence.

Evidence: Christman states, 'Our churches have not become independent anymore, they're more denominational... they're part of the problem.'

God's social system is decentralized

Summary: Exodus 18 shows a system of local judges and courts of appeal; maturity in self-government comes from teaching God's law, not top-down control.

Evidence: Christman explains, 'The whole thrust of this system... was local. Immediate day-to-day decisions would be made by the local elders.'

Theonomy unites independent churches

Summary: A shared commitment to applying God's law distinguishes these churches from antinomian groups and provides a basis for cooperation.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'What would unite these particular churches, independent though we be, is a doctrine of theonomy.'

Doctrine is prerequisite for fellowship

Summary: Without common doctrine, there is no basis for true fellowship, prayer, or shared life; community requires doctrinal unity.

Evidence: Weaver states, 'Where there is no commonality, there is no community. And where there is no community, it's because there's no doctrinal unity.'

Illumination fosters patience

Summary: Understanding that God illuminates minds at different times should produce patience with spiritual immaturity, preventing frustration and conflict.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'If God does not turn the lights on... we're never ever going to see. That means there must be patience and dignity with each other.'

Proximity is essential for future survival

Summary: In a fuel-less society, walking distance determines who can help; believers must consider relocating to be near trusted brethren.

Evidence: Weaver argues, 'There is inherently the need to be close, physically, if we take out the equation of vehicles and fuel.'

Family failure leads to generational apostasy

Summary: Passivity in discipleship results in children who do not know the Lord; parents must actively teach and model faith to prevent a lost generation.

Evidence: Clough cites Judges 2:10: 'There arose another generation after them which knew not the Lord,' and warns against neglecting testimony.

Scripture References

Galatians 5:22-23

Context: Weaver introduces the fruit of the Spirit, focusing on longsuffering as essential for community.

Psalm 133:1

Context: Christman opens with this verse to emphasize the goodness of brethren dwelling in unity.

Judges 10:1-5

Context: Christman reads about minor judges to illustrate the drift toward humanistic kingship.

Judges 12:8-15

Context: Christman reads the other bookend of minor judges, highlighting their temporary nature.

Ephesians 4:1-6

Context: Christman reads this passage on unity, lowliness, and the bond of peace.

Ephesians 4:11-16

Context: Christman reads about gifts for perfecting the saints and growing into unity of faith.

Galatians 5:14-15

Context: Christman warns against biting and devouring one another, using a humorous dog illustration.

Acts 2:41-47

Context: Weaver reads about the early church's devotion to doctrine, fellowship, and sharing, as a model community.

Acts 4:32-37

Context: Weaver shows that sharing was voluntary, not forced communism, as Barnabas sold land and gave to the apostles.

Acts 5:1-11

Context: Weaver uses Ananias and Sapphira to prove that property rights were retained; the sin was lying, not keeping money.

Proverbs 25:17

Context: Weaver cites this verse to teach respect for neighbors' privacy and time.

Galatians 6:2-5

Context: Weaver explains the balance of bearing one another's burdens and bearing one's own burden.

1 John 2:12-14

Context: Weaver uses this to show stages of spiritual growth (babes, children, young men, fathers) requiring patience.

Deuteronomy 11:13-21

Context: Weaver reads this promise of heaven on earth for obedience, tying it to community blessing.

Joshua 24:14-15

Context: Clough quotes Joshua's declaration to serve the Lord, urging families to make the same commitment.

Judges 2:8-10

Context: Clough warns that a generation arose that knew not the Lord, stressing the need for active discipleship.

1 Corinthians 3:11

Context: Clough emphasizes that Jesus Christ is the only foundation for the family.

Nehemiah 4:7-15

Context: Clough uses Nehemiah's example of families fighting together to illustrate family defense and unity.

Hebrews 10:25

Context: Weaver applies this verse to the assembling of churches together, not just individual congregations.

Historical References

Brook Farm (1841)

Context: Weaver mentions this transcendentalist utopian community near Boston as an example of failed socialism.

Equality Colony (1897-1907)

Context: Weaver cites this socialistic utopia in Washington State that quickly became extinct.

New Harmony (1824-1829)

Context: Weaver references Robert Owen's utopian community that lasted only five years.

Fruitlands (1843)

Context: Weaver describes this vegetarian, anarchist community that failed within a year due to impractical rules.

Cahuilla, California (1880s-1892)

Context: Weaver notes this socialistic experiment that ended, though the town still exists.

Jack Hyles

Context: Christman criticizes the late pastor's ministry for neglecting family and fostering personality cult, as an example of unbiblical church leadership.

Thomas Jefferson

Context: Christman quotes Jefferson on the tyranny of compelling a man to subsidize ideas he disbelieves.

Pilgrims

Context: Weaver references the Pilgrims' early socialist experiment and their return to the biblical work ethic.

Hillary Clinton's 'It Takes a Village' (1996)

Context: Clough refutes the book's thesis, asserting that the family, not the village, is responsible for rearing children.

Important Quotes

Longsuffering in the context of Scripture, within the Old English, ought not mean long pain or long hurting, but rather, perhaps, long allowing—allowing ourselves to be inconvenienced for the sake of another, a brother or a sister.

Significance: Redefines longsuffering as patient allowance rather than passive endurance, setting the tone for community relationships.

Unity is not uniformity. It doesn't say we have to all look alike, walk alike, talk alike. It's unity.

Significance: Clarifies that biblical unity allows diversity in practice while maintaining common faith.

Where there is no commonality, there is no community.

Significance: Succinctly states the prerequisite for true community: shared faith, culture, and heritage.

Doctrine determines our duty. Do you realize it's impossible to know your duty without doctrine?

Significance: Establishes the foundational role of doctrine in guiding Christian conduct and community life.

If God does not turn the lights on, if God does not open our eyes, if God does not give us light, we're never ever going to see.

Significance: Emphasizes the necessity of divine illumination for understanding, fostering patience with others.

As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

Significance: Calls families to a definitive, public commitment to follow God, regardless of societal trends.

There arose another generation after them which knew not the Lord.

Significance: Warns of the rapid spiritual decline that occurs when parents fail to disciple their children.

We are literally hurting our ministry, our testimonies. We're hurting the cause of Christ. We're losing forward momentum.

Significance: Highlights the destructive impact of internal strife on the church's mission and witness.

Discussion Questions

How does redefining longsuffering as 'long-allowing' change the way we handle minor offenses in our families and churches?

Context: Weaver's opening teaching on Galatians 5:22-23 and the bean plant illustration.

In what practical ways can we distinguish between biblical unity and unbiblical uniformity in our church practices?

Context: Christman's distinction from Psalm 133 and the Jamaican church example.

What steps can we take to ensure our churches remain independent yet interdependent, avoiding the drift toward denominational hierarchy?

Context: Christman's discussion of Judges and the trend toward humanistic kingship.

How does the doctrine of theonomy practically shape our approach to civil government, education, and family life?

Context: Weaver's introduction of theonomy and Christian reconstruction.

What does it look like to 'bear one another's burdens' while also 'bearing your own burden' in a close-knit community?

Context: Weaver's exposition of Galatians 6:2-5.

How can understanding the doctrine of illumination help us be more patient with spiritual immaturity in our families and churches?

Context: Weaver's teaching on 1 John 2 and the stages of spiritual growth.

What practical preparations should we make now to be able to defend our families and help our neighbors in a societal collapse?

Context: Weaver's scenario of the 12-year-old attacker and the announcement of the biblical home defense conference.

How can grandparents and older members of the church intentionally invest in the next generation to prevent a 'lost generation'?

Context: Clough's message on family community and the warning from Judges 2.

Applications

Practice Longsuffering Daily

Summary: Choose to overlook minor offenses and inconveniences from brothers and sisters, viewing them as opportunities to demonstrate the fruit of the Spirit.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'I can be long-suffering, or else I can let this fester... I can cut the community into pieces.'

Pursue Doctrinal Unity

Summary: Study and embrace theonomy and the whole counsel of God to establish a common foundation for fellowship and cooperation with other believers.

Evidence: Weaver states, 'What would unite these particular churches... is a doctrine of theonomy.'

Prepare for Physical Proximity

Summary: Evaluate your current location and consider relocating closer to trusted brethren to ensure mutual aid in times of crisis.

Evidence: Weaver urges, 'Where should you be when you lose your fuel? You better be where you hope to be and near who you hope to be near.'

Disciple Your Family Intentionally

Summary: Make a definitive commitment like Joshua to serve the Lord as a household, actively teaching children God's works and ways.

Evidence: Clough exhorts, 'As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord,' and warns of the generation that knew not the Lord.

Guard One Another's Dignity

Summary: When you learn of a brother's sin or weakness, choose to cover it in love rather than spreading gossip, following Matthew 18.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'We have the opportunity to guard a brother or a sister's dignity... or the flip side, we have the chance to spread it like wildfire.'

Develop a Biblical Work Ethic

Summary: Carry your own load while being ready to help others with genuine needs, avoiding laziness that strains community.

Evidence: Weaver explains Galatians 6:2-5, 'If it's something I can do, I'm not bothering them.'

Be Patient with Spiritual Growth

Summary: Recognize that believers are at different stages of maturity and that God illuminates truth in His timing; avoid frustration with those who don't yet understand.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'If God does not turn the lights on... I could preach on it for 400 years and they would still never see it.'

Prepare Theologically for Self-Defense

Summary: Study biblical principles of defense to be mentally and spiritually ready to protect your family and neighbors if attacked.

Evidence: Weaver presents the 12-year-old attacker scenario, saying, 'I've got to kill him... the theology that I already know, my heart's prepared.'

deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | clean_readable_transcript | 2026-06-06T13:30:12Z

deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | weaver_study | 2026-06-06T17:07:12Z