Hard Hearted And Evil Hearted
John Weaver | YouTube
| Lecture Metadata | Details |
|---|---|
| Speaker | John Weaver |
| Source | YouTube |
| Media ID | o5vZx2zIL6I |
| Subject | Old Testament Studies |
| Course | Proverbs-Related Topical Wisdom |
| Genre | Sermon |
| Date | 2016-11-18 |
| Dictation Name | |
| Book | Book 085: Proverbs-Related Topical Wisdom — Chapter 9 |
| Source Timed Segments | 77 |
Synopsis: Pastor John Weaver examines Matthew 27:1-5, contrasting the remorse of Judas with the callous indifference of the chief priests and scribes. He defines hard-heartedness and evil-heartedness as a corrupt mind destitute of truth, illustrated by the religious leaders' response to Judas's confession. The sermon warns against the hardening nature of sin and calls believers to guard their hearts, showing compassion even toward enemies.
Formatted Transcript
Introduction and Scripture Reading
Reading of Matthew 27:1-5, introducing the theme of hard-hearted and evil-hearted individuals, exemplified by the chief priests and scribes.
Matthew 27, and we're going to read the first five verses. Matthew 27, verses 1 through 5. The message today is "Hard Hearted and Evil Hearted." And we will demonstrate that just shortly. Notice Matthew 27, verse 1:
"When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death. And when they had bound him, they led him away and delivered him to Pontius Pilate, the governor. Then Judas, who had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, 'I have sinned in that I betrayed the innocent blood.'"
The Nature of Corrupt Minds
Examination of 1 Timothy 6:5 and 2 Timothy 3:8, explaining the Greek words for 'corrupt' and how a corrupt mind leads to destruction and resistance to truth.
Now I want you to hold Matthew 27; we're going to come back there, that's going to be our text. But I want you to look in 1 Timothy chapter 6 to begin with, because Paul is going to tell us several things about the kind of individuals that we're going to be talking about, these chief priests and these scribes in our Lord's day. So, in 1 Timothy chapter 6, if you look at verse 5, he says this:
"Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness, from such withdraw thyself."
Now note if you would,
"perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth."
These are the kind of men that suppose that gain is godliness. Now if you look in 2 Timothy chapter 3 and verse 8, he says it like this.
"Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth. Men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith." Now, interestingly, in 1 Timothy chapter 6 and in 2 Timothy chapter 3, the word "corrupt" is used in each verse. However, it is a different Greek word. If you would look in 1 Timothy chapter 6 and verse 5, when he talks about "perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds," the word "corrupt" here means that which corrupts in reference to the mind, morals, vigor, and strength, and leads to destruction in every area of life. This word is also used to designate the worm or the moth that eats and destroys clothing and provision. A moth can get into your garment, and it may be a slow process when the moth begins to eat, but it is a devastating process, and it is a sure process. When you look at 2 Timothy chapter 3 and verse 8, the word "corrupt" there refers to depravity and corruption, and that which leads to death.
In other words, it is that which causes one to destroy, be destroyed, or to perish. So interestingly, in both of these passages, in 1 Timothy 6 and 2 Timothy 3, that which is corrupted is the mind. "Men of corrupt minds." Such corruption of the mind, we must understand, is a corruption of our faculties. Our faculties, our mind, is that which perceives and understands. It is our mind that judges a feeling and that with which we determine. So if our minds are corrupt, then everything about us is going to be corrupt as well. So corrupt minds, according to 1 Timothy chapter 6, are minds that are destitute of the truth. They are minds that are materialistically oriented.
And then, of course, he says, these are "reprobate concerning the faith." And the word "reprobate" literally means that which is rejected, that which is unapproved, that which is spurious, and that which is to be cast away. So these men are men of corrupt minds. They're destitute of the truth. And more than only that, they stand against the truth, and they actually resist the truth.
Now, remember the title of this message is "Hard-Hearted and Evil-Hearted." Now, all of us have heard songs. In fact, there was an old country song years ago about a hard-hearted woman and a soft-hearted man. Well, I've got news for you. Men can be just as hard-hearted as women. And the truth is most of us have probably never really known people who are hard-hearted and evil-hearted at the same time. Now, we certainly read of hard-hearted people who not only murder their own children or watch them murdered and have absolutely no remorse. But yet the truth of the matter is, it is very difficult for you and I to conceive in our minds that there are people that actually exist that are incapable of feeling and are entirely destitute of compassion and empathy.
Religious Intolerance and Murder
Discussion of John 16:2 and historical examples like the Spanish Inquisition and Islamic jihadists, showing how religious intolerance leads to murder without remorse.
But you know what our Lord reminded us of in John 16:2? You don't have to turn there. He said this to his disciples: "They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God's service." Now, stop and think about that. Have you ever considered death at the hands of the religiously intolerant? If you've never considered death at the hands of the religiously intolerant, I would encourage you to read Fox's Book of Martyrs. You also might want to bone up on the Spanish Inquisition. There is absolutely nothing worse than murderers who murder freely and without remorse because they believe that is exactly what God would have them to do. And all you have to do is read about and witness the gruesome and the horrible tortures and murders and mutilations of the Islamic jihadists, even toward women and children. And when they murder, they do so seemingly without any ounce of remorse.
And they do so gladly. And they do so with rejoicing, thinking that is exactly that which their God demands of them.
The Plot to Kill Jesus
Analysis of Matthew 26:3-5, revealing the chief priests' and elders' conspiracy to kill Jesus, and the nepotism within the priesthood (Annas and Caiaphas).
Now in the context of Matthew 27, which we're going to come there in just a little while, Judas has betrayed the Lord Jesus Christ. In fact, he sold him for 30 pieces of silver. His actions were traitorous, treacherous, and treasonous. He personally knew that Jesus Christ was absolutely innocent and was absolutely pure. And yet he conspired with our Lord's enemies. Now, I want you to look back in Matthew 26, if you would please, beginning there with verse 3. You see, murder was in the hearts of the chief priests and the scribes and the Pharisees. It is true they wanted Jesus Christ, but they wanted him dead. Look in Matthew 26, beginning there with verse 3:
"Then assembled together the chief priests and the scribes and the elders of the people unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, and consulted"
—that is, they plotted, they planned—
"and consulted that they might take Jesus by subtlety and kill him. But they said, 'Not on a feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people.'"
So here they are, wanting Jesus Christ dead.
And they're planning on killing him. But we're not going to do it on a feast day because we don't want to upset the people. We don't want them to be against us. We want to do what we want to do, but we want the approval and the recognition of the people at the same time. You have to understand now that chief priests were those who presided in ecclesiastical affairs. The elders were basically judges in civil matters, and the scribes were supposedly doctors of the law who were directing both the chief priest and the elders. So it was these men then that comprised the Sanhedrin, the Jewish body that controlled the religion and the people at that particular time.
Now, the interesting thing is this. If you look back in Matthew 26 in verse 3, the Bible says, "Then assembled together the chief priests," plural. When we think of the chief priest, we normally think of singular, a high priest or a chief priest, but now it's plural. So we have to ask, why is it plural? Here is why. Listen carefully. I'm going to show you the scripture.
The answer is because Caiaphas married the daughter of Annas, who was joined with him in the priesthood. I want you to hold Matthew 26 and 27, but look in your Bibles, first of all, to Luke chapter 3 and verse 2. Look in Luke 3 and verse 2. Then we're going to go to the book of Acts. But look in Luke 3 and verse 2. Here's an interesting thing. And you're going to see that really times have not changed. But notice in Luke chapter 3 and verse 2, the Bible says,
"Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John, the son of Zacharias, in the wilderness."
So interestingly, both of these are named as high priests. If you look in your Bibles to Acts chapter 4 and verse 6, and this passage is very, very revealing. Acts chapter 4 and verse 6, we're still talking about Annas and Caiaphas. Look at this, if you would. In Acts chapter 4 and verse 6, the Bible says, "And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem."
What? Caiaphas, Annas, John, Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest. Are you listening? Nepotism abounded in the priesthood in Christ's day, just like nepotism abounds in our government today. You have a family or a clique that is in power and they want to stay in power. I don't care if you're talking about the Rockefellers, the Kennedys, the Clintons, doesn't matter who, it's the same thing.
Judas's Betrayal and the Thirty Pieces of Silver
Judas's initiation of the betrayal for thirty pieces of silver, the prophetic significance from Zechariah 11:12-13, and the valuation of Christ as a slave (Exodus 21:32).
"And from that time, he sought opportunity to betray him." Now, notice if you would please. One has to absolutely wonder if there had been any previous communications between Judas and the high priest. Obviously, the high priest wanted Jesus Christ dead. And that was probably common knowledge. But look, if you would please, at verse 14: "Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests." In other words, Judas is the one who instigated this betrayal. I'm sure he knew that they would be sympathetic. I'm sure that he knew that they would want to get in on this deal. But he is the one who initiated it. Notice if you would please. And he said unto them, "What will you give me, and I will deliver him unto you?" Isn't it amazing? Suppose I went up to Henry and I said to Henry, "What will you give me, and I will deliver him unto you?" What would be Henry's first question? "Who is the him?"
Who are we talking about? Oh, they knew automatically who Judas was talking about. And I find it interesting that Judas was almost ashamed to call the name of Jesus Christ right here. He just said, "I'll deliver him unto you." Note if you would please, the Bible says in verse 15, "And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. And from that time, he sought opportunity to betray him." And by the way, anytime anyone betrays Jesus Christ, it is with opportunity. It is convenient. In another passage, the Bible said he sought a convenient time to betray him. We always want to do things when it's convenient with us, and it does not reflect upon us at all. Now, the Bible says they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver. Have you ever wondered about the thirty pieces of silver? I want you to turn in your Bibles, hold Matthew 26 and 27, but turn, if you would please, to the book of Zechariah, which is the book right before Malachi, which is the last book in the Old Testament.
So we want to come to Zechariah and look in chapter 11 at verses 12 and 13. Zechariah 11, beginning there with verse 12. Because it was prophesied concerning this thirty pieces of silver. Notice Zechariah 11, verse 12:
"And I said unto them, 'If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear.' So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. And the Lord said unto me, 'Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prized at of them.' And I took the thirty pieces of silver and cast them to the potter in the house of the Lord."
Now, if you would turn in your Bibles, if you would please, to Matthew 27 and look at verse 9, and you'll see that that passage in Zechariah is applied to Jesus Christ in Matthew 27. The Bible says, note if you would please,
"Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, 'And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value.'"
Now, why did they say, "Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet," Jeremiah, not Zechariah? Well, Jeremiah certainly probably related this as well, but Zechariah was the one who gave this as well. And so, they took this thirty pieces of silver. Notice "the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value."
Now, I want you to notice, if you would, the latter portion of verse 9: "whom they of the children of Israel did value." Now, Zechariah calls the thirty pieces of silver "a goodly price." So here's my question. A goodly price for what? Have you ever wondered why they covenanted with Judas for thirty pieces of silver? Why not fifty? Why not a hundred? Why not twenty-nine? Why not forty-six? Why was it thirty pieces of silver? Notice if you would, the Bible said, "of whom the children of Israel did value him." What was thirty pieces of silver a goodly price for? Well, if you will turn in your Bibles to Exodus 21, you will find what thirty pieces of silver was a goodly price for. Look in Exodus chapter 21—I'm sorry, Exodus 21 it is—and look if you would please at verse 32. Exodus 21 and verse 32. Here it is.
"If the ox shall push a manservant or a maidservant"—that is, a slave—"he shall give unto their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned." So thirty shekels of silver was the price of a slave. So when they covenanted with Judas for thirty pieces of silver, they were valuing Christ like a slave. They thought no more of Jesus Christ than a slave. So probably, when the chief priests came up with thirty and the scribes came up with thirty pieces of silver, it was a demonstration of their absolute contempt for Jesus Christ. He was no more than a servant and no more than a slave to them. Let me read to you what Albert Barnes says on the thirty pieces of silver. This is interesting. He says, "The money usually denoted by pieces of silver, when the precise sum is not mentioned, that is a shekel, a silver Jewish coin amounting to about 50 cents. The whole sum, therefore, for which Judas committed this crime was $15." You say that's a paltry sum.
The Motive and Repentance of Judas
Judas's greed as the motive (John 12:6), his worldly repentance leading to death (2 Corinthians 7:10), and his confession of Christ's innocence.
Judas could have thought that he would have betrayed Jesus Christ, got the money, and that since Jesus Christ was absolutely innocent, that he would not have been condemned. And therefore Judas would have been better off financially, Christ would not be condemned, no one would ever know it, and it would be over. That could be a possible conjecture. We don't know. Another conjecture is this. Some think that what Judas was trying to do was to force Christ to play his hand. In other words, he actually thought that Christ might kill his enemies and set up his kingdom right there. That is a conjecture.
There's nothing in the scripture that even indicates that. But if you want to know why Judas betrayed Christ, I'll show you. I want you to turn in your Bibles to John chapter 12. John chapter 12. And I want us to begin reading there with verse 1. John 12, verse 1. Watch carefully. After we read this, we're going back to Matthew 27 and deal with our text. John 12, verse 1.
"Then Jesus, six days before the Passover"—that is when he must die—"came to Bethany, where Lazarus was, which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead. There they made him a supper, and Martha served, but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him. Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard." Now notice these next two words: "very costly." "And anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the odor of the ointment. Then said one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him, 'Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence and given to the poor?'" Three hundred pence, that's nearly a year's wages. "Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence and given to the poor?" Watch verse 6: "This he said, not because he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief and had the bag and bare what was put therein." Why did he betray Christ? He was a greedy, covetous thief. He wanted the money. He had probably been stealing out of the bag the disciples had entrusted him with. Who knows? But the Bible says he was an absolute thief. So he wanted the money.
Now, I want you to go back to Matthew 27. All this now brings us up to our text. Judas has betrayed him. He has been taken and condemned. Look what happens. "When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death. And when they had bound him, they led him away and delivered him to Pontius Pilate, the governor. Then Judas, who had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, 'I have sinned in that I betrayed the innocent blood.'"
"And they said, 'What is that to us? See thou to it.' And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple and departed and went out and hanged himself." Now, I want us to look at this very closely. When Judas understood that Christ was condemned, the Bible says he "repented himself." That is, he changed his mind.
Now let me tell you, there was nothing biblical or spiritual about that repentance. It was merely a worldly repentance that led to sorrow but not to salvation. You see, Judas repented but not like Peter. Peter repented, believed, and was pardoned. But Judas repented, despaired, and was ruined. I want you to look in your Bibles, hold Matthew 27, but turn right over to 2 Corinthians chapter 7. 2 Corinthians chapter 7. And let me show you the difference between a worldly repentance and a godly repentance. In 2 Corinthians chapter 7, look if you would please at verse 10. Here the apostle says this: "For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation, not to be repented of. But the sorrow of this world worketh death." So a godly sorrow will work repentance to salvation. But the sorrow of this world only works death. It certainly worked death in Judas. It was a mental, emotional, and physical death for him. He hanged himself.
However, before he hanged himself, he restored the thirty pieces of silver and declared, saying, "I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood." I want to give you what two commentators have said. First, on the repentance of Judas, and secondly, on the innocent blood. John Trapp, the old Puritan, said this on the repentance of Judas. Listen carefully. I love this. He said, "Here was contrition, confession, restitution." "Most men go not so far that yet profess large hopes of heaven. There was wanting or lacking that transmutation, conversion, and obedience of faith that should have completed his repentance."
Now listen to what he said. "He died in the birth as that foolish child Ephraim. He confessed to men and not to God. And by his confession, he sought no more than to ease his heart as drunkards by vomiting rid their stomachs." What was Judas concerned with? Himself. And all he was trying to do was get rid of the guilty conscience. I remember years ago reading about a man who walked into a police station in Alabama.
The Hard-Hearted Response of the Religious Leaders
The chief priests' dismissive reply 'What is that to us? See thou to it' demonstrates their lack of concern for God or man, violating all Ten Commandments.
What they just said violated all ten commandments. I want you to look at it. In Matthew 27, after he confesses and he says in verse 4, "I have sinned in that I betrayed the innocent blood," they said, "What is that to us? See thou to it." They had no concern for God. They violated the first four commandments. They had no concern for Judas. They violated the last six commandments. Now watch this. First, they had no concern for Judas, his despairing attitude and his obvious heartfelt confession of his evil deed and the innocence of Christ. Their answer denoted that they had nothing to do with his remorse of conscience and the belief that Jesus Christ was innocent. Here's their answer. Their answer signified that if Judas had sinned, he must answer for himself. That was absolutely no concern to them. They were not interested. They saw Judas in his abject state of despair. They saw him recoiling at his wickedness and the vileness of the deed that he committed. And their attitude is this: "What's that to us?"
It's no skin off my nose. It doesn't affect me. They were simply saying this: "Your so-called repentance and retraction and ruin are nothing to us. If you want to alleviate your guilty conscience, if you want to kill yourself, see thou to that. We used you. We got that which we wanted and now we could care less what happens to you. Go kill yourself. We don't care. It doesn't affect us one way or the other."
How would you like to go to a pastor for counseling when you're in despair, and you're depressed, and you've got problems, and the pastor looks at you and says, "Well, just go kill yourself and take care of all the problems. It doesn't matter to me what you do." I don't think I'd want to be around that preacher. I wouldn't want to be around. These are the pastors. These are the religious men. And they say to Judas, "See thou to it." They did not even consider him a neighbor or a friend or even a man. They could care less. They used him. And they discarded him. Are you listening to me? There are a lot of religious leaders. And a lot of civil leaders. And a lot of political leaders that do the same thing. Look what we do to our so-called soldiers.
We use them and we discard them. It's the same thing, same principle.
Applications and Warnings
Applications: sin's bitter end, guilt by consent (Psalm 50:16-18), the danger of comparing sins, the need for self-examination, and the hardening effect of sin.
The first one is this. Sin may be tasty in the beginning. But in the end, it's heartache, misery, and death. The scripture says it's sweet to the mouth, but bitter to the belly. Matthew Henry, in speaking of the sin of Judas, states this. Listen. "Now, in the end, now he curses the bag that he carried, the money he coveted, the priests he dealt with, and the day that he was born. The remembrance of his master's goodness to him which he had so basely requited, the bowels of mercy he had spurned, and the fair warnings he had slighted, steeled his convictions and made them even more piercing. Now he found his master's words true: 'It were better for that man that he had never been born.'"
Please note, sin will soon change its taste. Though it be rolled under the tongue as a sweet morsel, in the bowels, it will be turned into the gall of asps like John's book in Revelation 10 and verse 9. And that's true. All sin is tantalizing and tasty and enticing and exciting in the beginning. But in the end, it brings forth death. I want you to turn in your Bibles to Psalm 50, if you would please, for the second application. I want you to see this. Psalm 50. I want you to understand that consenting to sin and being an accessory to sin is to be guilty of sin. Psalm 50, verse 16. Look what God says: "But unto the wicked God saith, 'What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth?'" Now watch.
"Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee. When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentest with him, and hast been partaker with adulterers." How do they consent to thievery and theft? By not saying anything, by not revealing it, by not reproaching it, by not judging it. How did they become partakers with adulterers? By not declaring its wickedness, its vileness. They were silent. And God charges them with being absolutely guilty. Here again, Matthew Henry says this: "It is folly for us to think that the sins of others are nothing to us, especially those sins that we are in any way an accessory to or partakers in. Is it nothing to us that God is dishonored, souls wounded, Satan gratified, and his interests served, and that we have aided and abetted it? If the elders of Jezreel to please Jezebel murder Naboth, is it nothing to Ahab?"
"Yes, he is killed, for he's taken possession. The guilt of sin is not so easily transferred as some people think it is. If there was guilt in the matter, they tell Judas, that he must look to it, he must bear it. First, because he had betrayed him to them. His was indeed the greater sin, but it did not therefore follow that theirs was no sin. It is a common instance of the deceitfulness of our hearts to extenuate our own sin by the aggravation of other people's sins." "But the judgment of God is according to truth, not according to comparison." So I could look at Doc and say, "Oh, what an awful man. He's horrible. Thank God I'm not as bad as he is." What? But I am. I noticed I had to pick him. He's here. But you notice what I'm doing. I could say, "Whoo, at least"—and by the way, this happens in prison. This happens in prison.
The murderers are kind of over here. The thieves are over here. And the thieves will say, "Well, at least I'm not a murderer." And the murderer will say, "Well, I didn't rape a child. I'm not a pedophile." And what they are doing is they are extenuating and excusing their own sins by looking at the aggravated sins of everybody else. You can't do that. Your sin is your own, and sin is sin, and sin is guilty before God. God's judgment is always according to truth, not according to comparison. Thirdly, the actions of Judas should have excited the chief priests and the scribes to repentance. It should have. They heard his confession. They saw his restitution. But they were unmoved by suicide. Such is evidence of a seared conscience. And it aggravates their criminality. In refusing to consider the actions of Judas, they condemned themselves. And in one sense of the word, they were worse than Judas. Because at least Judas was sorrowful and made restitution.
They were not even remorseful. They rejoiced in the death of an innocent man. Their sin was actually worse. What God is telling us is that the perpetrator and the actor, the planner and the actor, are both guilty in the sight of God. Here's the fourth one. Listen carefully. When we are unmoved at the plight, disaster, and remorse of others, we need to examine our own hearts. If I'm unmoved at several of these people that we have on the prayer list that are really in dire straits fighting cancer, if I'm unmoved and I don't even consider praying for them or thinking of them or helping them in any way, I better examine my own heart. If I'm unmoved, listen carefully, even at the fall of my enemy, I better examine my own heart. It is true that there is a sense of relief when our enemies fall.
But on the other hand, it should be on our hearts that, "Lord, I wanted him gone, but not necessarily just like that. I mean, that's awful." I've got news for you. When you stop and think of a wicked man dying a wicked death, and then facing a holy righteous God, that's nerve-wracking for me. And the Bible says in Proverbs 24 and verse 17, listen carefully: "Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth." We may be thankful, but we're not rejoicing over it. Here's the fifth one. I wish I had time to preach this. Sin always hardens our heart. Do you realize the more we sin, the easier it is to sin? The easier it is to sin, the harder our hearts become. The harder our hearts become, the more evil our hearts become. That's why Proverbs 4 says this: "Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life." I wish I had another Sunday or two to preach on this. I've got something else I want to bring next Sunday, but when you read through the New Testament, even the apostles, the disciples of Jesus Christ, he looked at them and asked, "Is your heart also hardened?" And the Bible says several times that their hearts were hardened. We're not talking about the wicked, we're talking about the disciples of Jesus Christ. So we need to learn to keep our hearts with all diligence, for out of it, out of our hearts, are the issues of life.
We do not want to become hard-hearted and evil-hearted. We know people like that and the wicked are like that, but we're not to be like that. That's why in Romans chapter 12, what did our Lord say? And he's quoting from the Old Testament there. He said, "If your enemy hungers, what? Feed him. If he's thirsty, what? Give him water."
Now, God didn't tell you to go out and buy him a T-bone steak. He didn't tell you to buy him the most expensive drink in the world. He didn't say give him a Frappuccino or a Starbucks coffee. Give him water. Why in the world are you to feed your enemy? Why are you to give your enemy water? To keep your own heart. To make sure you don't become hard-hearted and evil-hearted.
Just because he does wrong does not mean that you are going to do wrong. Keep your heart with all diligence, lest you become hard-hearted and evil-hearted. Father, in the name of Jesus Christ, we bow to Thee this day. We thank You for Your Word, for Your truth, and we pray, Father, that You would speak to our hearts. Keep us, Lord, warm. Make our hide tough and our hearts tender. And help us to be in honor to the Lord Jesus Christ and to worship Him alone in whose name we pray. Amen.
Study Guide
Major Themes
Hard-Heartedness and Evil-Heartedness
Summary: The religious leaders exemplify a seared conscience, showing no remorse or compassion, being concerned only with their own power and position.
Evidence: They said, 'What is that to us? See thou to it.' (Matthew 27:4) and their plot to kill Jesus to maintain their place (John 11:48).
Corrupt Minds and Resistance to Truth
Summary: A corrupt mind, destitute of truth, leads to moral decay and opposition to God's truth, as described in 1 Timothy 6:5 and 2 Timothy 3:8.
Evidence: Paul describes 'men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth' who 'resist the truth' (1 Timothy 6:5; 2 Timothy 3:8).
The Deceitfulness and Consequences of Sin
Summary: Sin may be initially pleasurable but ultimately leads to misery and death; Judas's betrayal and suicide illustrate this truth.
Evidence: Judas's remorse and suicide after betraying innocent blood, and the proverb 'sweet to the mouth, but bitter to the belly.'
Guilt by Consent and Accessory
Summary: Being an accessory to sin or consenting to it makes one guilty, as seen in Psalm 50:16-18 and the example of Ahab and Naboth.
Evidence: Psalm 50:18: 'When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentest with him'; Ahab was guilty though he did not personally kill Naboth.
The Hardening Nature of Sin
Summary: Repeated sin hardens the heart, making it easier to sin and more evil; believers must guard their hearts diligently.
Evidence: Proverbs 4:23: 'Keep thy heart with all diligence'; even the disciples' hearts were hardened at times.
Key Arguments
The religious leaders were both hard-hearted and evil-hearted.
Summary: Their response to Judas's confession shows a complete lack of concern for God or man, violating all Ten Commandments.
Evidence: They said, 'What is that to us? See thou to it,' showing no remorse or compassion.
Judas's repentance was worldly, not godly.
Summary: Judas felt remorse and made restitution, but his sorrow led to death, not salvation, as described in 2 Corinthians 7:10.
Evidence: Judas 'repented himself' and hanged himself; 2 Corinthians 7:10 contrasts godly and worldly sorrow.
The thirty pieces of silver valued Christ as a slave.
Summary: The price was prophesied in Zechariah and matched the value of a slave in Exodus 21:32, showing contempt for Jesus.
Evidence: Exodus 21:32 sets thirty shekels as the price of a slave; Zechariah 11:12-13 prophesies the thirty pieces.
Consenting to sin makes one guilty.
Summary: Psalm 50:16-18 teaches that approving or not opposing sin makes one a partaker; the chief priests were guilty as accessories.
Evidence: Psalm 50:18: 'When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentest with him'; Ahab was guilty for Naboth's death.
Sin hardens the heart progressively.
Summary: The more one sins, the easier it becomes, leading to a hardened and evil heart; believers must guard their hearts.
Evidence: Proverbs 4:23; the disciples' hearts were hardened (Mark 6:52, 8:17).
Scripture References
Matthew 27:1-5
Context: The main text: the chief priests deliver Jesus to Pilate; Judas returns the silver and hangs himself.
1 Timothy 4:2
Context: Describes those with a seared conscience, speaking lies in hypocrisy.
1 Timothy 6:5
Context: Men of corrupt minds, destitute of truth, supposing gain is godliness.
2 Timothy 3:8
Context: Men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith, resisting truth like Jannes and Jambres.
John 16:2
Context: Jesus warns that some will kill believers thinking they serve God.
Matthew 26:3-5
Context: The chief priests and elders plot to take Jesus by subtlety and kill him.
Luke 3:2
Context: Annas and Caiaphas both called high priests.
Acts 4:6
Context: Annas the high priest, Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and kindred gathered.
Matthew 26:14-16
Context: Judas goes to the chief priests and agrees to betray Jesus for thirty pieces of silver.
Zechariah 11:12-13
Context: Prophecy of thirty pieces of silver cast to the potter.
Matthew 27:9
Context: Fulfillment of the prophecy of thirty pieces of silver.
Exodus 21:32
Context: Thirty shekels of silver is the price of a slave gored by an ox.
Luke 22:48
Context: Jesus asks Judas, 'Betrayest thou the Son of Man with a kiss?'
John 18:38; 19:4,6
Context: Pilate three times declares Jesus innocent.
Mark 14:21
Context: Woe to the man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed; it were better he had never been born.
John 12:1-6
Context: Judas objects to the costly ointment because he was a thief and held the money bag.
2 Corinthians 7:10
Context: Godly sorrow works repentance to salvation; worldly sorrow works death.
John 11:47-48
Context: The chief priests fear losing their place and nation if Jesus is not stopped.
Psalm 50:16-18
Context: God rebukes the wicked who consent with thieves and partake with adulterers.
Proverbs 24:17
Context: Do not rejoice when your enemy falls.
Historical References
Fox's Book of Martyrs
Context: Encouraged reading to understand death at the hands of the religiously intolerant.
Spanish Inquisition
Context: Example of religious intolerance leading to torture and murder.
Islamic jihadists
Context: Modern example of murder without remorse, thinking it is God's service.
Albert Barnes (commentator)
Context: Quoted on the value of thirty pieces of silver and on Judas's confession proving Christ's innocence.
John Trapp (Puritan commentator)
Context: Quoted on Judas's repentance: contrition, confession, restitution, but lacking true conversion.
Matthew Henry (commentator)
Context: Quoted on the bitterness of sin and on guilt by consent in the matter of Naboth.
Naboth and Ahab (1 Kings 21)
Context: Example of guilt by accessory: Ahab was guilty though Jezebel arranged the murder.
Veteran suicides (22 per day)
Context: Modern parallel to 'What is that to us?' attitude of leaders toward suffering individuals.
Important Quotes
What is that to us? See thou to it.
Significance: The chief priests' dismissive response to Judas's confession, epitomizing their hard-heartedness and evil-heartedness.
I have sinned in that I betrayed the innocent blood.
Significance: Judas's confession of Christ's innocence, which the religious leaders ignored.
Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness, from such withdraw thyself.
Significance: Paul's description of the kind of men the chief priests were, used to define corrupt minds.
They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God's service.
Significance: Jesus's warning about religiously motivated murder, illustrating the evil-heartedness of the chief priests.
For godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation, not to be repented of. But the sorrow of this world worketh death.
Significance: The distinction between Judas's worldly repentance and true godly repentance.
Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth.
Significance: A warning against hard-heartedness even toward enemies, calling for self-examination.
Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life.
Significance: The central application: believers must guard their hearts to avoid becoming hard-hearted and evil-hearted.
Discussion Questions
How does the response of the chief priests ('What is that to us?') reveal both hard-heartedness and evil-heartedness?
Context: The sermon contrasts Judas's remorse with the leaders' indifference.
What is the difference between worldly sorrow and godly sorrow, and how did Judas exemplify worldly sorrow?
Context: Based on 2 Corinthians 7:10 and Judas's actions.
Why did the chief priests want Jesus dead, and how does their motive relate to modern resistance to biblical truth?
Context: John 11:48 shows their fear of losing power; the sermon applies this to government opposition to Christianity.
In what ways can we become accessories to sin by our silence or consent, according to Psalm 50:16-18?
Context: The sermon uses the example of Ahab and Naboth to illustrate guilt by consent.
How does sin progressively harden the heart, and what practical steps can we take to 'keep our hearts with all diligence'?
Context: Proverbs 4:23 and the warning that even disciples' hearts can be hardened.
Why is it dangerous to compare our sins with others' as a way of excusing ourselves?
Context: The sermon notes that God's judgment is according to truth, not comparison.
How should we respond when we see an enemy fall, and why does Proverbs 24:17 warn against rejoicing?
Context: The application about being unmoved at others' plight, even enemies.
What does the valuation of Christ as a slave (thirty pieces of silver) teach us about the contempt of the religious leaders?
Context: Exodus 21:32 and Zechariah 11:12-13 show the prophetic significance.
Applications
Guard Your Heart Against Hardening
Summary: Believers must diligently keep their hearts, as sin progressively hardens them, leading to evil-heartedness.
Evidence: Proverbs 4:23; the warning that even disciples' hearts were hardened.
Show Compassion Even to Enemies
Summary: We are called to feed and give water to our enemies, not to rejoice at their fall, to prevent our own hearts from hardening.
Evidence: Romans 12:20; Proverbs 24:17.
Examine Your Own Heart When Unmoved by Others' Suffering
Summary: If we are indifferent to the plight of others, including enemies, we must examine our hearts for hardness.
Evidence: The chief priests' indifference to Judas's despair; application to prayer list and veteran suicides.
Avoid Being an Accessory to Sin
Summary: Consenting to or remaining silent about sin makes us guilty; we must not extenuate our sin by comparing it to others'.
Evidence: Psalm 50:16-18; the example of Ahab and Naboth.
Recognize the Bitter End of Sin
Summary: Sin may be pleasurable initially but leads to misery and death; Judas's suicide is a sobering example.
Evidence: Judas's remorse and suicide; 'sweet to the mouth, but bitter to the belly.'
Do Not Trust in Worldly Repentance
Summary: Mere remorse or confession without true conversion leads to death; we must seek godly sorrow that leads to salvation.
Evidence: 2 Corinthians 7:10; Judas's repentance was worldly and ended in suicide.
deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | clean_readable_transcript | 2026-06-05T14:02:08Z
deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | weaver_study | 2026-06-06T01:56:13Z