The Doctrine of Election - 2

John Weaver | SermonAudio

Lecture MetadataDetails
SpeakerJohn Weaver
SourceSermonAudio
Media ID1270912594410
SubjectOld Testament Studies
CourseProverbs: The Fear of the Lord and Wisdom: The Doctrine of Election
GenreSermon
Date2009-01-27
Dictation Name
BookBook 118: The Doctrine of Election — Chapter 2
Source Timed Segments64

Synopsis: John Weaver continues a study on the biblical doctrine of election, focusing on the principle of election from Ephesians 1:4. He argues that election is God's sovereign, active choice of certain persons to salvation, necessarily implying that others are passed over (preterition). Using non-soteriological examples (David choosing stones, Jesus choosing apostles), he demonstrates that choosing always involves leaving others. He addresses objections by emphasizing that election is gracious, not unjust, because all deserve condemnation. Weaver presents three biblical statements: God has a sovereign right to bestow grace unequally, He exercises that right, and He has reasons beyond saving as many as possible—namely, His own glory. He outlines four types of election: theocratic (national), vocational, messianic, and soteriological (unto salvation). The sermon concludes that election is biblical, logical, unfathomable due to depravity, and gracious, calling for humility.


Formatted Transcript

Opening

Chapter 1, verse 1:

Scripture Reading — Ephesians 1:1-14
"Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints who are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus. Grace be to you and peace from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ, according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love. Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of the glory of his grace wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved, in whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his grace, wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence, having made known unto us the mystery of his will according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself."

"That in the dispensation of the fullness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth, even in him, in whom also we have obtained an inheritance being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will. That we should be to the praise of his glory who first trusted in Christ, in whom also ye trusted after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, in whom also after that ye believed ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance unto the redemption of the purchased possession unto the praise of the glory of his grace."

Introduction and Review

Weaver reviews the previous study on election, reiterating its definition and the triune work in Ephesians 1. He emphasizes that election is foundational, difficult, important, blessed, distasteful, separating, and evangelical.

Some weeks ago we began a study on the biblical doctrine of election. I began by stating that this doctrine is one of the most hated and misunderstood doctrines in the Word of God. It cannot be understood by the unregenerate according to 1 Corinthians 2 and verse 12. And many times it will not be understood by many Christians just simply because it has never clearly been taught, and secondly, because they have heard of the perversions and not the true teaching. We gave a simple definition, and that is this: Election, simply stated, has been defined as God's eternal, free, unconditional, and irreversible choice of certain persons in Christ to everlasting life.

Now, in Ephesians chapter 1, I pointed out the fact that you have here the great triune God involved in the work of redemption. It can be broken down into three sections. You have the will of the Father in election, verses 1 through 6. Secondly, the work of the Son in redemption, 7 and 8. And thirdly, the work of the Spirit in salvation, verses 12 and 14. This passage gives us what is known as the economical trinity. Everything is out of the Father, through the Son, and in the Holy Spirit. Now, we pointed out six things in our introductory remarks concerning the doctrine of election. First of all, it is a foundational doctrine. You cannot understand the doctrine of salvation. You cannot even understand the work of the Triune God in salvation without an understanding of the work of election.

This is why the Word of God tells us in 2 Timothy 2, verse 19, that

Scripture Reading — 2 Timothy 2:19
"nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are His."

It is the very foundation of our comfort and of our hope. Then secondly, I pointed out that it is a difficult doctrine. It is a difficult doctrine, number one, to our understanding because it requires us to think and to meditate, and it requires divine illumination. Secondly, it is a difficult doctrine as to our acceptance of it, simply because it is a doctrine that humbles man and elevates God. And man, by nature, wishes to ascend to the very throne of God. He would rather see God dethroned and himself enthroned than to see God have his proper place. And then it is difficult as to the proclamation of it.

For you ask the question, where do you begin? And the only way that you can begin is with the Word of God. And then thirdly, it is an important doctrine. For the Word of God tells us in Ephesians 1:3 that all of our blessings are found because God has chosen us in Jesus Christ. Fourthly, I have pointed out it was a very blessed doctrine, for the Word of God says, if you look at it in verses 3 and 4, "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ, according as he hath chosen us in him." Fifthly, I pointed out that it is a distasteful doctrine. Men do not like the doctrine. Sixthly, it is a separating doctrine. You will remember our Lord taught it in John chapter 6, and especially verses 65 and 66, when he got through saying, "No man can come unto me except it were given unto him of my Father." The Bible said, "From that time many went back and walked with him no more." And then we

found out, saith he, that it is an evangelical doctrine, for the great apostle Paul says, "I endure all things for the elect's sake, that they might be saved." Now, when you begin to talk about the doctrine of election, no one that is a Bible-believing Christian will argue the fact that the Bible does not teach election. Everyone that believes the Bible believes that the Bible teaches the doctrine of election.

The Principle of Election: God Chooses

The point of contention is not whether election is taught, but who does the electing. Ephesians 1:4 clearly states God chose us. The words elect, chose, chosen occur 73 times in the New Testament.

Every believer will acknowledge that. The point of contention is not the doctrine. But the point of contention is, who is it that does the electing? Is it God or is it man? The Bible dogmatically asserts the doctrine of election as a biblical principle. And here in Ephesians 1, I want us to see first of all this morning and our single point, the principle of election. If you will notice in Ephesians chapter 1 and verse 4, "according as he hath chosen us." Now that should answer the question right there, who does the electing? Very clearly the Bible says it is God the Father. For in verse 3 he says, "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." And then in verse 4, "according as he hath chosen us."

Now the words elect, chose, chosen, and choose occur 73 times in the New Testament. Now, to begin with, I want you to see the doctrine of election by showing you those words that do not refer to a soteriological framework, that is, the framework of salvation. I believe you can understand the doctrine of election by looking at the words choose and chosen, first of all, in their non-salvation framework. And by the way, I want you to notice as we look at these before we look at the ones that relate to salvation, I want you to notice that election always involves and necessarily involves a reprobation or a preterition. Now, the word reprobation and the word preterition are synonymous.

Election Implies Preterition

Using non-salvation examples (Psalm 78:67-68, 1 Samuel 17:40, Luke 6:13, Acts 6:5, Acts 15:7), Weaver shows that choosing always means passing over others. Preterition is not an active decree; God simply withholds grace from already condemned sinners.

And they just simply mean a passing over or an omission from. To choose one necessarily implies that others are passed over and are omitted or left. If you would look in your Bibles to begin with, holding Ephesians 1 to Psalm 78, and remember these very first verses are in a non-salvation framework. That is, they do not refer to our personal salvation. However, Psalm 78 could certainly refer to it. In fact, I kind of hate to use that term, but I wanted to get across what I was trying to say. I don't really think there are any verses in the Bible that are non-soteriological, that is, that do not relate to salvation, for everything relates to our salvation in one sense of the word. But what I was talking about was primarily our personal salvation. In Psalm 78, if you would look at verse 67 and 68, Psalm 78, verse 67, "Moreover he," and it's referring to God, "moreover he refused the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim, but chose the tribe of Judah, the Mount Zion which he loved.

Scripture Reading — Psalm 78:67-68
" Now here Scripture says that God very plainly chose the tribe of Judah. He chose Jerusalem in which to put and to place his holy name. He chose not the tabernacle of Joseph, that is, the children of Ephraim and Manasseh. And it singles out that he chose not the tribe of Ephraim, but you know that our Lord came through the tribe of Judah.

And so here is a very choice of one which necessarily implied a passing over of others. If you would turn in your Bibles now to 1 Samuel, chapter 17, and verse 40. 1 Samuel, chapter 17. David is going out to fight Goliath. You'll remember that Saul has armed him with his armor. And David says that he cannot go in Saul's armor, for that armor has not been proved.

But notice what he does. 1 Samuel chapter 17 and verse 40: "And he," that is David,

Scripture Reading — 1 Samuel 17:40
"took his staff in his hand, and chose him five smooth stones out of the brook, and put them in a shepherd's bag which he had even in a script, and a sling was in his hand, and he drew near to the Philistine."

Now notice the Bible says that David chose him five smooth stones out of the brook. That means that David looked at those stones which his eyes could see, and he chose five. It means that all the others were left. Now why he chose those stones? Probably they fit in his sling better. Maybe one or two of them were pointed, and he thought he could sink that point deep into the Philistine's brow. I don't know. But the very fact that he chose five meant that he passed over the others.

If you would look in your Bibles to Luke 6 and verse 13, you'll find that this is true in the New Testament as well. Luke 6 and verse 13:

Scripture Reading — Luke 6:13
"And when it was day, he,"

our Lord Jesus,

Scripture Reading — Luke 6:13
"called unto him his disciples, and of them he chose twelve, whom also he named apostles."

So here our Lord calls to himself his disciples. Now, I don't know how many were there, but there were certainly more than twelve. For Scripture says, out of that number he chose twelve, which means he passed over the others, and he only designated these original twelve as the apostles. He chose twelve and passed over the others. In Luke chapter fourteen and verse seven, Luke fourteen and verse seven, "And he put forth a parable to those which were bidden, when he marked how they chose out the chief rooms, saying unto them." And so he's talking about the Pharisees and how they loved the chief seats and the chief places in the synagogues.

And so here these individuals were making a choice. And the very fact that they chose what they termed the best, they bypassed and left out the rest. If you would look in the book of Acts, chapter 6, to begin with, and verse 5. Acts chapter 6 and verse 5, a very familiar passage, the choosing of what is commonly known as the first deacons. Acts chapter 6 and verse 5.

Scripture Reading — Acts 6:5
"And the saying pleased the whole multitude. And they chose Stephen, a man full of faith, and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicholas, a proselyte of Antioch."

Now, notice there is a whole multitude there. But out of the whole multitude, only seven are chosen, which means the others are passed over or left. And then one other, in Acts chapter 15 and verse 7, notice what the Apostle says. And Acts chapter 15 says, "And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up and said unto them, Men and brethren, you know how that a good while ago God made choice among us that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel and believe." Peter said, God chose me to open the door to the Gentiles. He didn't choose James. He didn't choose Bartholomew. Peter said, he chose me. That means the others were passed over in that particular aspect. Now, one can clearly see from these verses that when one is chosen, then others are left.

However, when you begin to talk about reprobation, when you begin to talk about preterition, you must remember that the act of reprobation is not an active decree as election is. Election is an active decree where God literally chooses some to salvation. You see, reprobation and preterition do not have to be an active decree. For men, by nature, are already condemned and on their way to hell. All God has to do to condemn a man to hell is absolutely nothing, for the man is already condemned. All God does is merely withhold his grace, merely withhold his free gifts of repentance and faith. And may I point out to you that no man by nature wants repentance. No man by nature wants faith. Yea, the Word of God tells us very clearly that they despise them and they will have nothing to do with them. And you will remember in Luke chapter 19, the very words of the wicked are, "We will not have this man to reign over us." And in reprobation, in preterition, all God has to do is absolutely nothing.

Answering the Objection of Injustice

Election is not unjust because it deals with depraved sinners. If God gave justice, all would be condemned. The fact that any are saved is grace. An illustration of a widow adopting three orphans shows that choosing some is gracious, not unjust.

Now, election is an active decree, where reprobation and preterition is God just determines in his own counsel, according to his own will, to not give grace and faith and repentance to certain creatures. Now, this is one of the chief objections of the doctrine of election, because every time you begin to talk about election, someone is going to come up with a statement, "But that is unjust." Well, I've got several answers for that objection. Number one is this, and it should be very obvious, that election does not merely deal with creatures as simply creatures. But election deals with creatures as depraved, rebellious, ungodly, wicked, God-defying, Christ-hating sinners. And the very fact that any are saved is a miraculous work of grace. You will remember I quoted Romans 9:29 two weeks ago. That's what the Apostle Paul said as he quoted Isaiah when he said,

Scripture Reading — Romans 9:29
"Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a

remnant, we would have been as Sodom and Gomorrah." In other words, if God in his election had not chosen some unto salvation, Paul and Isaiah both state that none would ever be saved. And so the very fact that God chose is a means for praise and admiration.

Now, when you think about election, you cannot think about an arbitrary, sadistic God, because most people try to say that God said, "I'll take this and I'll leave that, and I'll take this and I'll leave that." I don't know the basis on which God chose. The Bible tells you, and we'll get to that just a little bit later, that he did it according to the counsel of his will, which means that whatever God did, he did it as it was consummately wise. And by the way, when someone tries to say that that's not just when you hear about the doctrine of election, my standard response is, "You're right, it's not just." If we got justice, every one of us would be condemned. It's grace. And that's why the Bible speaks in Romans 11 of the election of grace. You know, it's amazing how we always confuse things. Let's suppose that here is a wealthy widow woman. She has raised all of her family. She has done a good job. And all of her children are well-adjusted, happy, married couples, having a good income, and just everything perfectly. And all of a sudden, this widow woman decides that her husband is gone now, and her children are raised, and she's rather lonely, and she's well off, and what she would like to do is raise some more children. And so she goes to an orphanage, and let's say that there are 130 children in that orphanage.

And she looks them over, and she says, "I tell you what, I believe I can handle three, and I'll take that boy and those two girls." Now, no one would ever think of saying, "What a wicked, ungodly, unjust woman. She left 127." The fact is, she didn't have to take any. And the very fact that she chose three was an act of grace. And everyone would say, "What a gracious woman. What a generous woman." Because she chose three, we don't ever think of condemning her because she left 127. Well, the very thing is true of God. It's not the fact that God did not choose the whole world.

That is a matter of concern to us. The matter that should amaze us is that God chose. He didn't have to. And so, that is one of the chief objections.

Now, there are three biblical statements concerning God and his election. Let me give you these three statements and we'll look at the Scripture. The first statement is this: God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one subject than he does another. God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one subject than another, especially since grace is unmerited and undeserved favor. If you would turn in your Bibles to Matthew chapter 20, and there you will see the parable of the vineyard. And you'll notice what our Lord says as he hired laborers to go work in that vineyard. In Matthew chapter 20, beginning with verse 12, these early workers are complaining, saying, "These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, who have borne the burden and the heat of the day. But he answered one of them and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong. Didst not thou agree with me for a penny? Take that thine is, and go thy way, I will give unto this last, even unto the first."

Three Biblical Statements on God's Election

1) God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace on one than another (Matthew 20:15, Romans 9:20-21). 2) God exercises that right (Psalm 147:19-20, Romans 3:1-2, Acts 9:15). 3) God has reasons beyond saving as many as possible—His own glory (Matthew 11:21-26, Romans 9:22-25, Proverbs 16:4).

That is a matter of concern to us. The matter that should amaze us is that God chose. He didn't have to. And so, that is one of the chief objections.

Now, there are three biblical statements concerning God and his election. Let me give you these three statements and we'll look at the Scripture. The first statement is this: God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one subject than he does another. God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one subject than another, especially since grace is unmerited and undeserved favor. If you would turn in your Bibles to Matthew chapter 20, and there you will see the parable of the vineyard. And you'll notice what our Lord says as he hired laborers to go work in that vineyard. In Matthew chapter 20, beginning with verse 12, these early workers are complaining, saying, "These last have wrought but one hour, and thou hast made them equal unto us, who have borne the burden and the heat of the day. But he answered one of them and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong. Didst not thou agree with me for a penny? Take that thine is, and go thy way, I will give unto this last, even unto the first."

Notice verse 15, "Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good?" Notice what our Lord says, "Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own?" You never condemn a man because he walks up to you and gives you a hundred dollar bill. You don't look him in the eye and say, "Well, why didn't you give me a thousand?" You're thankful for the hundred. And you recognize the very fact that had he so pleased, he could have not given you any. It's lawful for him to do with what he will with his own. And so our Lord says, according to my grace, I may bestow it upon one and not upon another. I may give one more and one less. It is mine. I may do with it what I will. If you would look in your Bibles to Romans chapter 9, verses 20 and 21. Romans chapter 9, verses 20 and 21.

Notice what God says, "Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, to make of the same lump one vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?" God says, "That's my right. I can do what I will with my own." And who is it will question me for doing it? Who art thou that repliest against God? And so Scripture teaches us that God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one subject than he does upon another. And Scripture tells us, secondly, that God has been pleased to exercise that right. For there he tells you in Romans chapter 9 that he makes one vessel of honor and another of dishonor. He not only has that right, he has been pleased to exercise that right in dealing with men.

Let me show you this. Turn in your Bibles to Psalm 147 and look at verse 20. Psalm 147 and verse 20.

Let's read verse 19 in connection with it. Psalm 147, verse 19: "He shewed his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not so dealt with any nation. As for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the Lord." Now, you must admit, according to the Scripture, God certainly gave more grace and more revelation to the nation of Israel than any other nation on earth. He did not give it to the Hittites. He did not give it to the Hivites. He did not give it to the Philistines. He did not give it to the Jebusites. He gave it to Israel. And the Word of God says, "He hath not dealt so with any nation." And if you will turn to Romans chapter 3 and look at verses 1 and 2, even the mighty Apostle Paul acknowledges it. Notice Romans chapter 3, verses 1 and 2: "What advantage then hath the Jew, or what profit is there in circumcision? Much in every way, chiefly that unto them were committed the oracles of God." Paul says the advantage that the Jew had over the Gentile was not only did they have the ceremonies of God, but chiefly they were the nations that were given the Word of God. And so God is saying that He is not only sovereign to give His grace as He pleases, bestowing more upon one and less upon another, but that He actually uses that sovereign right. "He hath not so dealt," says the psalmist, "with any nation."

That's why our Lord in John 15:16 looked at His disciples and said, "You have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you." And if you will look in Acts chapter 9 and verse 15, showing you that he has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one subject than another. Notice what he says concerning Saul of Tarsus, who is converted and becomes the mighty Apostle Paul. Acts 9, verse 15: "But the Lord said unto him," unto Ananias, "Go thy way, for he," Saul, "is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles and kings and the children of Israel." I might ask how many of you have ever witnessed to kings? How many of you have ever witnessed to Israel? Saul was a chosen vessel who had more grace in the fact that he witnessed to all three.

Now, the third statement is this. The first one is that God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace upon one. Second statement is that God actually exercises that right. And the third statement, listen very carefully, is this: that God has some other reason than that of saving as many as possible for the way in which he distributes his grace. I'm going to show it to you in the Bible. God has some other reason than that of saving as many as possible for the way in which he distributes his grace. I don't know if you have ever noticed it, but there is a sign on Highway 341 going to Brunswick, and the sign says, "Souls are only gold," which is really an unbiblical statement. For our only goal as Christians is the glory of God, which would include the salvation of souls. But I'm showing you some verses in just a moment which tell you very categorically that God has some other reason than that of saving as many as possible in the way he distributes his grace.

If you would look in your Bibles to Matthew 11. Matthew 11. And let's begin reading there with verse 21. And if someone tells me that the reason God gives grace is to save as many as possible, I've got some questions concerning this passage to ask. Matthew 11, verse 21, our Lord says,

Scripture Reading — Matthew 11:21-26
"Woe unto thee, Chorazin! Woe unto thee, Bethsaida! For if the mighty works that were done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented."

God is saying, if Tyre and Sidon, who were destroyed, had seen the mighty works that had been done in Chorazin and Bethsaida, Tyre and Sidon would have repented and lived. My question is this: If God is interested in quote-unquote saving as many as possible, why were not those mighty works done then in Tyre and Sidon? Look at it in verse 22:

Scripture Reading — Matthew 11:21-26
"But I say to you, it shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment than for you."

"And thou, Capernaum, who art exalted in heaven, shall be brought down to hell. For if the mighty works which were done in thee had been done in Sodom, it would have remained to this day." Did you hear that? God said if the works which had been done in Capernaum had been done in Sodom, Sodom would have repented and lived and been in existence this day. My question is, why were not those works done in Sodom? Notice verse 25, "At the same time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes." Now, wait a minute. That if these mighty works had been done in these other towns, they would have repented and lived. Well, you ask the question, why were not these mighty works done there then? Our Lord says that he thanks the Father for he has hidden these great secrets from the wise and the prudent, and he has revealed them unto babes.

And you know our Lord gives us the answer as to why these mighty works were not done in Sodom and Gomorrah and Tyre and Sidon. There it is in verse 26: "Even so, Father, for it seemed good in thy sight." That's the only answer in Scripture. It seemed good in the sight of God. If you would look in your Bibles to Romans chapter 9 again, and let's read verses 22 through 25. Romans 9, verse 22. Notice, I'm showing you from Scripture that God has some other reason than that of saving as many as possible for the way in which he distributes his grace. Romans 9, verse 22: "What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction, and that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy which he had afore prepared unto glory, even us whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?" And he saith also unto Hosea, "I will call them my people which were not my people, and her beloved which was not beloved."

Now notice, he said in verse 22, "What if God, willing to show his wrath and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering vessels of wrath that were fitted to destruction." He endures great longsuffering, and also he allows his people to suffer long with those who are fitted to destruction. And this particular work is in order that they might be destroyed, and that he might make the riches of his glory known on the vessels of mercy. You see, the reason God's grace cannot be chiefly concerned with man is because then man would be designated as the best good. And the best good is God. And God can only be concerned with Himself. For if God were concerned chiefly with man, then man in reality would be greater than God. And for the verse that will really clinch it for you, if you will look in Proverbs 16, verse 4. Proverbs 16, verse 4.

Here is a very plain statement of Holy Scripture. What God has done is this: God has created all things for His glory. And he works all things for his glory. For in Proverbs 16 and verse 4, the Bible says,

Scripture Reading — Proverbs 16:4
"The Lord hath made all things for himself."

And then just in case somebody didn't quite understand that statement, he went on to explain it:

Scripture Reading — Proverbs 16:4
"Yea, even the wicked for the day of evil."

God hath made all things for himself. That is, he even bypasses some individuals with his grace, and so fits them for the day of evil, that is, the destruction in the day of wrath.

Now, have you ever stopped to think that without heaven, if God had damned everyone, which he could have, for all have sinned and come short of the glory of God, no one would ever know anything about the grace and the mercy of God. But if God saved everybody, then no one would ever know anything about the wrath and the justice and the anger of God. Don McKinney, a preacher friend of mine, made this statement, and I liked it. And I think it's an excellent explanation. It's the closest I can come to. He says, "When God in eternity past viewed man as fallen and sinful, rebellious and depraved, the wrath of God arose and said, 'Damn them all!' The love of God arose and said, 'Save them all!' And then the wisdom of God came and said, 'Divide the lump. Let some praise thy grace and some praise thy justice.'" And in Romans chapter 9, that's exactly what he said, of the same lump he made some vessels of honor and some vessels of dishonor.

Four Types of Election in the Bible

1) Theocratic/national election (Deuteronomy 4:37, 7:6-8). 2) Vocational election (Deuteronomy 18:1-5, 1 Corinthians 3:4-7, 4:7). 3) Messianic election (Isaiah 42:1, 1 Peter 2:4-6). 4) Soteriological/ecclesiastical election unto salvation (Ephesians 1:4, 2 Thessalonians 2:13).

Now, when you talk about election, I want you to notice, and we'll jot these down, I ask you to, and then we'll close with these. There are four types of election mentioned in the Bible. Four types. The first type is what is known as theocratic or national election. You would turn in your Bible to Deuteronomy chapter 4 to begin with. Deuteronomy chapter 4. There is theocratic or national election. Deuteronomy chapter 4 and verse 37.

Notice what Moses says very plainly,

Scripture Reading — Deuteronomy 4:37; 7:6-8
"And because he loved thy fathers, therefore he chose their seed after them, and brought thee out in his sight with his mighty power out of Egypt."

And so God chose the children of Israel. If you look in Deuteronomy 7, verses 6-8, Deuteronomy 7, verses 6-8, God says, "For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God." Notice, "The Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself above all people that are upon the face of the earth. The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because you were more in number than any people, for you were the fewest of all people." In other words, God didn't choose them because of something in them, because of something they did or something they didn't do.

It was not because of their greatness, their might, their strength, their works. They didn't have any. Why did he do it? Verse 8, "But because the Lord loved you." In other words, he loved you just simply because it pleased him to love you. And he chose you, he said. And so here is what is known as theocratic or national election. You might also jot down Romans 2:28-29, and Romans 9 and verse 6. There, the Word of God even tells you that there is still an election among the elect nation, for they are not all of Israel who are of Israel. There is the Israel of God within Israel. So there is national election. Secondly, there is what is known in the Bible as vocational election.

Turn in your Bibles to Deuteronomy chapter 18, if you would please. Deuteronomy chapter 18. Let's begin reading with verse 1. Deuteronomy 18, verse 1: "The priests, the Levites, and all the tribe of Levi shall have no part nor inheritance with Israel. They shall eat the offerings of the Lord made by fire and his inheritance. Therefore shall they have no inheritance among their brethren. The Lord is their inheritance, as he hath said unto them."

"And this shall be the priest's due from the people, and from them that offer sacrifice, whether it be of ox or sheep, they shall give unto the priest the shoulder, and the two cheeks, and the maw. The firstfruit also of thy corn, and of thy wine, and of thine oil, and of the first of the fleece of thy sheep thou shalt give to him. For the Lord thy God hath chosen him out of all thy tribes to stand and minister in the name of the Lord, him and his sons forever. And if a Levite come from any of the gates out of all Israel, where he sojourned, and come with all his desire of his mind in the place which the Lord shall choose, then he shall minister in the name of the Lord his God as all his brethren the Levites do which stand before the Lord."

Now let's just stop right there. This speaks of a vocational election. God chose only the tribe of Levites to stand before him. Not all of the children of Israel could serve in the tabernacle. Not all could serve in the temple, only the Levites. And not every Levite was a high priest.

Now, beloved, let me ask you something. If you are going to disparage election and view it as unbiblical, if God does not have a sovereign right to save whom he will, then he does not either have the sovereign right to choose whom he will to be his servants. And yet he very undeniably chose the tribe of Levi. None of the other tribes could do it. You remember what happened to several of the kings who tried to usurp the priest office, got killed. He rejected Saul and had Saul killed. Uzziah. Now what I'm saying is, not everyone is a pastor teacher. And have you ever noticed, not every pastor teacher is a Charles Haddon Spurgeon. And not everyone is a George Whitefield. And not everyone is a John Calvin. Not everyone is some mighty warrior in the faith. In other words, God has the sovereign right to call whom he will, listen to me, and even distribute gifts and graces in that vocation.

If you would look in your Bibles, please, to 1 Corinthians chapter 3, there was a faction in the Corinthian church simply because they did not understand this. You see, and this is another reason why we have our young men preach. Not just so the church can determine their gifts. That is one reason, that's true. Not just to give them the opportunity. That is another reason, that's true. But this is a third reason. So that we may come to the realization that we are to come to hear the Word of God and not men. Some may speak more eloquently than others. Some may have better outlines than others. But you see, this was the problem in the Corinthian church in 1 Corinthians chapter 3 and verse 4. For while one saith, "I am of Paul," another saith, "I am of Apollos."

He said, "Are you not yet carnal or fleshly? Who then is Paul and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom you believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?" Somebody said, "Boy, I like Paul. He's more spiritual." Somebody said, "But I like Apollos. Boy, he can really thunder it out." And what they were doing was basing their likes upon the abilities and the gifts and the graces that God had given certain men. And there were factions in that church. And Paul says, "No, even as God hath given to every man." All that Apollos is, God gave him. All that Paul is, God gave him. All that Sam is, God gave him. All that Weaver is, God gave him. All that Goten is, God gave him. In other words, you are not to look at the man, but at the word that he preaches. And that's why he said in 1 Corinthians chapter 4 and verse 7, look at it very carefully.

"For who maketh thee to differ one from another? And what hast thou that thou didst not receive? Now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?" In other words, he says, God has given to every man sovereignly as he wills. If election is not true, if God does not have the right to do with his own as he wills, then I'd like to complain because I'm not a Spurgeon or a Whitfield. I'd like to be a Spurgeon or a Whitfield. But I can only be John Weaver and exercise the gifts that God has given me. There is a vocational election. Thirdly, there is a messianic election. That may shock you, but that is true. There is a messianic election.

If you will look in Isaiah chapter 42, and let's read verses 1 through 2. There is a messianic election. Isaiah 42, verse 1. Notice what God says concerning his Christ: "Behold, my servant whom I uphold, mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth, I have put my spirit upon him. He shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles. He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. A bruised reed shall he not break, and the smoking flax shall he not quench, for he shall bring forth judgment unto truth." Notice if you would please, in verse 1, God calls Christ "My servant" and "My elect." And then if you would look in your Bibles to 1 Peter chapter 2. 1 Peter 2, and there we'll read verses 4-6, speaking of Messianic election. 1 Peter 2, verses 4-6: "To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed of men, but chosen of God and precious. Ye also, as living stones, are built up a spiritual house and holy priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ."

"Wherefore also it is contained in the Scripture, Behold, I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone elect, precious, and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded." So Jesus Christ is called God's elect. Now do you begin to understand why the Scripture says that we are chosen in him, because Christ is God's first elect. And the entire body of the redeemed are then chosen in Christ. So there is a messianic election. And then, fourthly, there is what we refer to as a soteriological or an ecclesiastical election. That is, an election unto salvation, the elect of the Church. Or the Bible tells you in Ephesians 1 in verse 14 that he hath chosen us in Christ. But one other passage, if you would look in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, and there we'll read verse 13, and you can see very clearly this election unto salvation. Election is not just into certain vocations. It is true there is an election of vocations. But there is an election unto salvation. In 2 Thessalonians 2, verse 13, he says, "But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth."

So there is a theocratic election, there is a vocational election, there is a messianic election, and there is an election unto salvation. Now, what shall we say concerning the principle of the doctrine of election? Well, I have four statements down, and I hope that you will come to the same conclusions that I have come to. The first one is this: that election is biblical, and honesty in faith accepts it. Election is biblical, and honesty in faith accepts it. No man can honestly deny that the Bible teaches election. It is biblical, and honesty in faith accepts it. Secondly, election is logical, and consistency in doctrine requires it.

Concluding Statements on Election

Election is biblical and honesty accepts it; logical and consistency requires it; unfathomable and depravity distorts it; gracious and humility bows to it. Every person in heaven wanted to be there; every person in hell wanted to be there.

If you ever believe that God is God, you must believe that He is sovereign. And if God is sovereign, that means He may do exactly as He pleases and answer to no one. That's why David said in Psalm 115, "But our God is in the heaven; he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased." Once you come to the realization that God is God and not man, then, beloved, you must come to the conclusion that election is logical and consistency in doctrine requires it. Whenever you hear someone say, "I came to Christ," you ought to say, "That's wonderful." And the Bible teaches the responsibility of man, and the Bible does teach that sinners come to Christ. But then you ought to ask them, "Why did you come to Christ?" "Well, I just decided to come to Christ." "Well, what made you decide to come to Christ?" "Well, I was convicted." "Of who convicted you?" "Well, God did." "Well, why did God convict you and not somebody else?" You see, you just keep pushing it back, and when it gets to God, that's as far as you can go.

Election is logical, and consistency in doctrine requires it. Thirdly, election is unfathomable, and the depravity of man distorts it. Now, I know you've heard all kinds of things about the doctrine of election. I've had preachers in this town say that Brother Weaver believes that God just takes some and throws them into heaven and they're screaming, "I don't want to be saved, I don't want to be saved," and others he throws into hell and they're hollering, "But I want to be godly, I want to be holy." That's malarkey. I don't believe that. The Bible doesn't teach it. No one that ever believes the Bible believes that. I believe that every man that ever wanted to go to heaven is in heaven. Every man that ever is in heaven wanted to go there. Everybody that's ever in hell wanted to go there. That's exactly what they got. In hell is what they wanted and what they deserved. C.S. Lewis in his book, The Great Divorce, made this statement: "Heaven is the abode of those that say to God, 'Thy will be done.' And hell is the abode of those that God says to them, 'Thy will be done.'" The fourth statement is this: that election is gracious and humility must bow to it.

Beloved, when you come to the realization that the only reason you're saved is because it pleased God in saving you, it will cause you to melt at God's feet and thank Him for His miraculous grace. Who are you to know the truth? Who are you to be converted? Who are you to be forgiven? Who are you to be saved? Who are you to be serving our Lord with multitudes?


Study Guide

Major Themes

God's Sovereignty in Election

Summary: God actively and unconditionally chooses certain individuals for salvation according to His own will, not based on human merit or foreseen faith.

Evidence: Ephesians 1:4 says 'according as he hath chosen us.' Weaver states, 'The Bible dogmatically asserts the doctrine of election as a biblical principle.'

Preterition and Reprobation

Summary: Choosing some necessarily means passing over others. Reprobation is not an active decree; God simply withholds grace from already condemned sinners.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'To choose one necessarily implies that others are passed over and are omitted or left.' He cites Psalm 78:67-68 and other examples.

Grace vs. Justice

Summary: Election is an act of grace, not injustice. All deserve condemnation; the wonder is that God saves any. Objections to election misunderstand grace.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'If we got justice, every one of us would be condemned. It's grace.' He uses the widow and orphans illustration.

God's Glory as the Ultimate Purpose

Summary: God's distribution of grace is not primarily to save as many as possible but to display His glory—both mercy and justice.

Evidence: Proverbs 16:4: 'The Lord hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.' Weaver explains God's wisdom divides the lump to praise both grace and justice.

Types of Election

Summary: The Bible presents four types of election: national (Israel), vocational (Levites, apostles), messianic (Christ), and soteriological (unto salvation).

Evidence: Weaver walks through Deuteronomy 4:37, 18:1-5; Isaiah 42:1; 2 Thessalonians 2:13 to demonstrate each type.

Human Responsibility and Divine Sovereignty

Summary: While election is true, the Bible also teaches human responsibility. The sermon affirms that all who want to be saved are saved, and all in hell wanted to be there.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'I believe that every man that ever wanted to go to heaven is in heaven... Everybody that's ever in hell wanted to go there.'

Key Arguments

Election is clearly taught in Scripture

Summary: The Bible repeatedly uses words like 'chose' and 'chosen,' and Ephesians 1:4 explicitly states God chose us. No honest Bible believer can deny election.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'Every believer will acknowledge that. The point of contention is not the doctrine. But the point of contention is, who is it that does the electing?'

Choosing always implies leaving others

Summary: Examples from David choosing stones, Jesus choosing apostles, and the church choosing deacons show that election necessarily involves preterition.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'The very fact that he chose five meant that he passed over the others.'

Reprobation is passive, not active

Summary: God does not actively decree reprobation; He simply withholds grace from those already condemned. No one naturally wants repentance or faith.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'All God has to do to condemn a man to hell is absolutely nothing, for the man is already condemned.'

Election is gracious, not unjust

Summary: Since all are sinners deserving condemnation, God's choice to save some is pure grace. The widow adopting orphans illustrates this.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'The very fact that she chose three was an act of grace. And everyone would say, What a gracious woman.'

God has a sovereign right to distribute grace unequally

Summary: Matthew 20:15 and Romans 9:20-21 teach that God, as the potter, has the right to do as He wills with His own, bestowing more grace on some.

Evidence: Weaver quotes Matthew 20:15: 'Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own?'

God's purpose in election is His own glory, not maximizing salvation

Summary: Matthew 11:21-26 and Romans 9:22-25 show that God withholds grace from some to display His justice and wrath, and bestows grace on others to display mercy.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'God has some other reason than that of saving as many as possible for the way in which he distributes his grace.'

Christ is the elect one, and believers are chosen in Him

Summary: Isaiah 42:1 and 1 Peter 2:4-6 call Christ God's elect. Believers are chosen in Christ, making election Christocentric.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'Jesus Christ is called God's elect. Now do you begin to understand why the Scripture says that we are chosen in him, because Christ is God's first elect.'

Election leads to humility, not pride

Summary: Understanding that salvation is entirely of God's grace causes believers to melt in gratitude, not boast. Humility bows to election.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'When you come to the realization that the only reason you're saved is because it pleased God in saving you, it will cause you to melt at God's feet.'

Scripture References

Ephesians 1:1-14

Context: Weaver reads the entire passage to establish the triune work in redemption and the statement 'according as he hath chosen us in him.'

1 Corinthians 2:12

Context: Cited to show that the unregenerate cannot understand the doctrine of election.

2 Timothy 2:19

Context: Quoted to show election is foundational: 'The Lord knoweth them that are His.'

John 6:65-66

Context: Referenced to show election is a separating doctrine; many disciples left Jesus after He taught it.

Psalm 78:67-68

Context: God chose the tribe of Judah and Mount Zion, passing over Joseph and Ephraim, illustrating election in a non-soteriological context.

1 Samuel 17:40

Context: David chose five smooth stones, leaving others, demonstrating that choosing implies passing over.

Luke 6:13

Context: Jesus chose twelve apostles out of a larger group of disciples, passing over the rest.

Acts 6:5

Context: The multitude chose seven deacons, passing over others, illustrating election.

Acts 15:7

Context: Peter says God chose him to open the door to the Gentiles, passing over other apostles for that task.

Romans 9:29

Context: Quoted to show that without election, none would be saved; all would be like Sodom and Gomorrah.

Matthew 20:12-15

Context: The parable of the vineyard workers shows God's sovereign right to bestow grace as He wills.

Romans 9:20-21

Context: The potter has power over the clay to make vessels of honor and dishonor, illustrating God's sovereign right.

Psalm 147:19-20

Context: God gave His word and statutes to Israel, not to other nations, showing He bestows more grace on some.

Romans 3:1-2

Context: Paul acknowledges the advantage of the Jews was that they were entrusted with the oracles of God.

Acts 9:15

Context: Saul is called a chosen vessel to bear Christ's name before Gentiles, kings, and Israel.

Matthew 11:21-26

Context: Jesus pronounces woe on cities that saw miracles but did not repent, and thanks the Father for hiding truth from the wise and revealing it to babes, showing God's sovereign distribution of grace.

Romans 9:22-25

Context: God endures vessels of wrath to show His power and make known the riches of His glory on vessels of mercy.

Proverbs 16:4

Context: The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of evil, showing God's ultimate purpose is His glory.

Revelation 4:11

Context: All things were created for God's pleasure, reinforcing that God's purpose is His own glory.

Deuteronomy 4:37; 7:6-8

Context: God chose Israel not because of their greatness but because He loved them, illustrating theocratic election.

Historical References

Charles Haddon Spurgeon

Context: Mentioned as an example of a mighty preacher with exceptional gifts, illustrating vocational election.

George Whitefield

Context: Mentioned alongside Spurgeon as an example of a preacher with extraordinary gifts.

John Calvin

Context: Mentioned as another example of a notable figure in church history with significant gifts.

C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce

Context: Quoted: 'Heaven is the abode of those that say to God, Thy will be done. And hell is the abode of those that God says to them, Thy will be done.'

Don McKinney

Context: A preacher friend who summarized the interplay of God's attributes in election: wrath said 'Damn them all,' love said 'Save them all,' wisdom said 'Divide the lump.'

Important Quotes

Election, simply stated, has been defined as God's eternal, free, unconditional, and irreversible choice of certain persons in Christ to everlasting life.

Significance: Provides Weaver's concise definition of election, framing the entire sermon.

The point of contention is not the doctrine. But the point of contention is, who is it that does the electing? Is it God or is it man?

Significance: Clarifies that the debate is not over whether election is biblical, but over who does the choosing.

To choose one necessarily implies that others are passed over and are omitted or left.

Significance: Establishes the logical connection between election and preterition.

All God has to do to condemn a man to hell is absolutely nothing, for the man is already condemned.

Significance: Explains the passive nature of reprobation, countering the idea that God actively predestines people to hell.

If we got justice, every one of us would be condemned. It's grace.

Significance: Answers the objection that election is unjust by pointing to the reality of universal guilt.

God has some other reason than that of saving as many as possible for the way in which he distributes his grace.

Significance: Introduces the argument that God's ultimate purpose is His own glory, not merely maximizing the number saved.

Heaven is the abode of those that say to God, 'Thy will be done.' And hell is the abode of those that God says to them, 'Thy will be done.'

Significance: A memorable summary of human responsibility and divine sovereignty, attributed to C.S. Lewis.

Discussion Questions

How does the definition of election as 'God's eternal, free, unconditional, and irreversible choice' challenge or comfort you?

Context: Weaver gives this definition early in the sermon.

Why is it important to recognize that election necessarily implies preterition (passing over others)?

Context: Weaver uses multiple biblical examples to demonstrate this principle.

How does the illustration of the widow adopting three orphans help you understand the gracious nature of election?

Context: Weaver uses this illustration to counter the objection of injustice.

In what ways does the truth that God has a sovereign right to bestow more grace on some than others affect your view of your own gifts and calling?

Context: Weaver discusses vocational election and 1 Corinthians 4:7.

How does understanding Christ as God's 'elect' change the way you think about your own election?

Context: Weaver explains messianic election from Isaiah 42:1 and 1 Peter 2:4-6.

Weaver says election is 'unfathomable, and the depravity of man distorts it.' What are some common distortions of election you have encountered?

Context: Weaver addresses misrepresentations of his own beliefs.

How does the statement 'every man that ever wanted to go to heaven is in heaven' reconcile divine sovereignty and human responsibility?

Context: Weaver makes this claim near the end of the sermon.

What practical effect should the doctrine of election have on our humility and worship?

Context: Weaver concludes that election is gracious and humility must bow to it.

Applications

Accept the biblical teaching of election with honesty

Summary: Since election is clearly taught in Scripture, believers should accept it even if it is difficult, rather than explaining it away.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'Election is biblical, and honesty in faith accepts it.'

Recognize God's sovereign right in distributing gifts and callings

Summary: Instead of envying others' gifts or ministries, believers should acknowledge that God gives to each as He wills and be content.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'I can only be John Weaver and exercise the gifts that God has given me.'

Respond to election with humility and gratitude

Summary: Understanding that salvation is entirely of God's grace should lead to melting at God's feet in thankfulness, not pride.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'When you come to the realization that the only reason you're saved is because it pleased God in saving you, it will cause you to melt at God's feet.'

Preach the gospel to all, trusting God's electing purpose

Summary: While God has chosen a multitude, believers are commanded to preach to every creature, trusting God to save His elect.

Evidence: Weaver prays, 'Enable us, O Lord, to do everything that we can to reach thy people... And thou hast commanded us to preach the gospel to every creature.'

Avoid factions over giftedness in the church

Summary: Recognizing that all gifts come from God should prevent divisions based on preferences for certain preachers or leaders.

Evidence: Weaver cites 1 Corinthians 3:4-7 and says, 'You are not to look at the man, but at the word that he preaches.'

Marvel at God's grace rather than questioning His justice

Summary: Instead of objecting that election is unfair, believers should be amazed that God chose to save anyone at all.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'The matter that should amaze us is that God chose. He didn't have to.'

deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | clean_readable_transcript | 2026-06-05T15:24:20Z

deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | weaver_study | 2026-06-06T04:47:14Z