Hireling or Shepherd Part 3

John Weaver | SermonAudio

Lecture MetadataDetails
SpeakerJohn Weaver
SourceSermonAudio
Media ID26201423496977
SubjectFamily Government
CourseThe Christian Family: Marriage and Household Order: Remember Lot And His Wife
GenreSermon
Date2020-02-02
Dictation Name
BookBook 030: Hireling or Shepherd — Chapter 3
Source Timed Segments86

Synopsis: In this sermon, John Weaver contrasts the hireling who abandons the sheep with the good shepherd who protects them, emphasizing that shepherds must be fighters. He draws on biblical examples like David and the military organization of Israel in Numbers to argue that pastors, as under-shepherds, have a duty to train and lead their congregations in self-defense. Weaver connects this to the American militia tradition, citing founding fathers and legal sources, and urges families and churches to be prepared to defend themselves against evil, both spiritually and physically.


Formatted Transcript

Introduction: The Distinction Between Hireling and Shepherd

Weaver reviews John 10:11-15, highlighting that the hireling flees from danger while the shepherd protects the sheep and is willing to lay down his life.

John 10, verses 11 through 15. This is part 3, on hireling or shepherd. Notice John 10, verse 11. Our Lord says,

Scripture Reading — John 10:11-15
"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. But he that is a hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth a wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth. And the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep. The hireling fleeth, because he is a hireling, and careth not for the sheep. I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even so I know the Father, and I lay down my life for the sheep."

This brief series, which will be ending today, has been dealing with the fact that our Lord makes a clear distinction between a hireling and a shepherd.

The hireling is someone who's just simply hired, who cares not for the sheep, and when danger arises, he flees and leaves the sheep, and the sheep are usually attacked, scattered, and or destroyed. So our Lord makes a clear distinction because it's the shepherd who always protects the sheep and is willing to give his life for the sheep. So it is the responsibility of the shepherd, as I pointed out in the very first message, not only to warn the sheep, but to feed the sheep. And in the second message, I pointed out how the shepherd always leads the sheep. And then I made a clear distinction between the pastors in the 17th and 18th centuries and the pastors that are today.

The Shepherd as Fighter: David's Example

Using 1 Samuel 17, Weaver shows David as a shepherd who fought lions and bears, demonstrating that shepherds must be fighters.

Shepherds by nature must be fighters because there are wolves, there are bears, there are lions, and there are other animals that are quite willing and quite ready to destroy and feast upon the sheep themselves. Now, I'm sure that you remember the story of David in 1 Samuel 17. Let me just read a few verses just to give you this little background, and listen carefully because there will be an application of it. And David said to Saul, "Let no man's heart fail because of him," that is, because of Goliath. "Thy servant will go and fight this Philistine." And Saul said to David, "Thou art not able to go against this Philistine to fight with him, for thou art but a youth, and he a man of war from his youth." And David said unto Saul, "Thy servant kept his father's sheep. And there came a lion and a bear, and took a lamb out of the flock. And I went after him, and smote him, and delivered it out of his mouth. And when he arose against me, I caught him by his beard, and smote him, and slew him. Thy servant slew both the lion and the bear, and this uncircumcised Philistine shall be as one of them, seeing he hath defied the armies of the living God." David said moreover, "The Lord that delivered me out of the paw of the lion, and out of the paw of the bear, he will deliver me out of the hand of this Philistine." And Saul said unto David, "Go, and the Lord be with thee." Well, Saul wasn't going to be with him, but he certainly wanted the Lord to be with him.

Now, David said that the Lord delivered him out of the paw of the bear and the paw of a lion. This was a real incident that happened. Of course, David was God's anointed. He was God's man, and God certainly used him. But let me show you how Solomon, David's son, applies this. So I want you to look in your Bibles, if you would, to the book of Proverbs, chapter 28, verses 15 and 16. Proverbs 28, verses 15 and 16.

Wicked Rulers as Roaring Lions and Ranging Bears

Proverbs 28:15-16 and Psalm 94:20-21 are cited to show that tyrants are like predatory beasts who oppress the people and make sin legal.

Note, if you would, what the Scripture says. Proverbs 28, beginning there with verse 15. The Bible says,

Scripture Reading — Proverbs 28:15-16
"As a roaring lion and as a ranging bear, so is the wicked rule over the poor people. The prince that wanteth understanding, or lacketh understanding, is also a great oppressor. But he that hateth covetousness shall prolong his days."

So notice, if you would please, in verse 15, that a tyrant, a despot, a totalitarian is likened unto a roaring lion and a ranging bear. And the Bible says those individuals are individuals who lack understanding. So consequently, because they are roaring lions and ranging bears and lack understanding,

they seek to destroy the sheep and the liberty and the freedom that sheep enjoy. Now, if you would turn in your Bibles to Psalm 94 very quickly, you will see how this is confirmed by David in verses 20 and 21. Notice Psalm 94 verses 20 and 21. Psalm 94 verse 20. Here's the question that is asked. I've pointed this out previously, but look at it in light of this.

Scripture Reading — Psalm 94:20-21
"Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee which frameth mischief by law?"

First of all, it's a throne which speaks of governmental power. Secondly, it's a throne of iniquity. It is a wicked civil government. And lastly, they make sin legal, which frameth mischief by a law. Mischief is another word in the Bible for sin. So here's the question. Shall a wicked civil government have fellowship with God when that wicked civil government makes sin legal?

And the answer, of course, is no. But look in verse 21, which verifies the wickedness. "They gather themselves together against the soul of the righteous, and condemn the innocent blood." In other words, they don't care what God says, they don't care what God's law declares, they just simply do as they please. Now, there are many other scriptures in the Bible that make this exceedingly clear. For instance, Proverbs 28 and verse 28, the Bible says,

Scripture Reading — Proverbs 28:28
"When the wicked rise, men hide themselves. And when they perish, the righteous increase."

So when the wicked rise, men hide themselves. In other words, they understand the collective wickedness of the wicked. And it's kind of like Gideon when he was threshing wheat behind what was the wine press, I think it was. Why was he not threshing the wheat up on the mountain?

God as a Man of War and the Mustering of Israel

Weaver explains that God is the Lord of hosts (armies) and brought Israel out of Egypt in battle array; the book of Numbers is about mustering armies.

Now, obviously, we know that sheep are not really defensive animals. I mean, defenseless animals, because they can run, they can hide, they can do a lot of different things. And the ram certainly is very formidable in and of himself. But seriously speaking, the sheep are supposed to be protected by the shepherd. It's the shepherd, according to John 10, who is supposed to be willing to lay down his life for the sheep. It is the shepherd, then, who guards the sheep, who guides the sheep, who feeds the sheep, who warns the sheep, who leads the sheep. And it's just something that shepherds are supposed to do. They are supposed to be real fighters and fearless. I was reading recently through the book of Numbers, and something hit me like a ton of bricks.

And I'm going to share that with you, but just before I do, I want to share with you several of the passages. I want you to go back in your Bibles to 1 Samuel 17, and this is the passage where David is fighting Goliath. But there is a verse that I want you to see, and I want you to understand a word that is being used. So in 1 Samuel 17, if you look at verse 45, look at what David says to Goliath. "Then said David to the Philistine, Thou comest to me with a sword, and with a spear, and with a shield, but I come to thee in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied." Now note, if you would, there is the name, the Lord of Hosts. You will find that name used of God all throughout the Bible. Sometimes it's the Lord God of Hosts or the Lord of Hosts. But it is the Lord God of Hosts. The word host is a very unique word.

The Hebrew word is tsaba, and in the Septuagint it is sabaoth. It literally means the God of the armies. Anytime you see the word hosts, it refers to the armies. In fact, in verse 45, he says, "I come to thee in the name of the Lord of hosts," that is, the Lord of the armies, "the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied." So the word host, or hosts in this instance, relates to war, armies, battles, soldiers, and warfare.

Now, with that in mind, I want you to look in your Bibles to the book of Exodus, chapter 13. Exodus, chapter 13. Everyone knows that God delivered the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt. When you look in Exodus, chapter 13, there is a verse that is very revealing, because when you think about the Exodus, you're thinking about nearly 2 million people leaving Egypt. 2 million people. Can you imagine 2 million people leaving New York City at one time? Or Chicago, Illinois at one time? How in the world could 2 million people leave Egypt at one time? Now remember, the Lord is the Lord God of hosts. He's the God of the armies. So if you look at Exodus chapter 13 and verse 18, here's what the Bible says. "But God led the people about through the way of the wilderness of the Red Sea, and the children of Israel went up harnessed out of the land of Egypt." They went up harnessed out of the land of Egypt. Now, the word harnessed is the word chamush in the Hebrew, and it means they went out in battle array.

They went out in battle by fives. In other words, they did not just all walk any way they pleased. God had them in a fighting position. They went out by fives, ranks of fives, in order, in line. Remember, He is the God of the armies, the God of battle. If you remember, the Bible tells you in Deuteronomy chapter 4 that God delivered the children of Israel out of Egypt by war, because He fought against not only Pharaoh but all the gods of Egypt as well. So if you look now in Exodus chapter 15, let me show you this. Exodus 15, Pharaoh and his army now has been drowned in the Red Sea, and so there is a song of rejoicing. In Exodus 15, "Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto the Lord, and spake, saying, I will sing unto the Lord, for he hath triumphed gloriously. The horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea. The Lord is my strength and song."

"He is become my salvation. He is my God, and I will prepare him a habitation, my Father's God, and I will exalt him." Watch, "The Lord is a man of war. The Lord is his name. Pharaoh's chariots and his host have been cast into the sea. His chosen captains are also drowned in the Red Sea. The depths have covered them. They sank to the bottom like a stone. Thy right hand, O Lord, is become glorious in power. Thy right hand, O Lord, hath dashed in pieces the enemy."

Now go back to verse 3. "The Lord is a man of war." So, we found out He is the Lord God of the armies. He brought Israel out in ranks of five, harnessed in battle array, because God is a man of war. Now, with that in mind, I want you to turn to Numbers chapter 1. Numbers chapter 1. And I want you to see something that is very clearly taught in this book. But first of all, let me just tell you that since God is a man of war, since God has armies, then what God does, He musters His armies. Did you know that the book of Numbers literally is the book of mustering. Why is it called the book of Numbers? Because God numbers, God musters His armies in this book. So just look, if you would, at the first three verses right now, Numbers chapter 1.

"And the Lord spake unto Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the tabernacle of the congregation on the first day of the second month in the second year after they were come out of the land of Egypt, saying, Take ye the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel," now watch, "after their families, by the house of their fathers, with the number of their names, every male by their polls, from twenty years old and upward, all that are able to go forth to war in Israel, thou and Aaron shall number them by their armies." So I want you to note the word armies happens to be plural. And if you will go back to verse 2, they are to be numbered after their families, by the house of their fathers, and notice it to be every male from twenty years old and upward. Now look at verse 4, "...and with you there shall be a man of every tribe, every one the head of the house of his fathers."

So what that means, and I'll come back to this a little bit later, there's always a prince over Judah, a prince over Reuben, a prince over Gad. There's a leading prince, one over each of the twelve tribes. In fact, they are listed for us in the book of Numbers. However, what I want you to see right now is verse 44 through verse 46 of Numbers chapter 1. Because in this initial numbering, here's why I said there's probably 2 million people who came out of Egypt. Notice Numbers chapter 1 verse 44.

Scripture Reading — Numbers 1:44-46
"These are those that were numbered, which Moses and Aaron numbered, and the princes of Israel being 12 men. Each one was for the house of his fathers. So were all those that were numbered of the children of Israel by the house of their fathers, from twenty years old and upward, all that were able to go forth to war in Israel. Even all they that were numbered were six hundred thousand, three thousand, five hundred and fifty."

So there were six hundred and three thousand, five hundred and fifty men that were twenty years old and over that were able to go to war.

Now, if you've got 600,000 men over 20, and each one happens to be married, that's 1,200,000 right there. And then they've got children. And then what about some of these men that are not numbered, young men? The point I'm trying to make is, probably there's pretty close to two million people who came out of Egypt. And God brought them out in a military order. So you have then the God of hosts, the God of the armies. God is a man of war. He brought Israel out of Egypt by an act of war.

And then, of course, the Bible even speaks of the book of the wars of the Lord. Now, when you look at Numbers chapter 1, there was one prince over each of the tribes. So every tribe had a prince or had a head. Each one of these princes was responsible for mustering the armies in his tribe. He was responsible to see that they were numbered. He was responsible to see that they were taught and that they were trained.

The Tribal and Family Militia Structure in Israel

Numbers 1 and 10 show that each tribe had a prince and was composed of smaller family armies, functioning as independent militias.

Now that does not mean that he had to do all the teaching and all the training himself. He certainly had someone under him, probably many, many men, but he was the one who was overall responsible for the training. Moreover, you're going to find that each family had a responsibility as well. Each family was responsible for training their young men to fight. Listen, the head of the house that would not train his sons to fight was training them to be victims and not victors. Okay? I'm going to show you this a little more specifically in just a moment. But note if you would, here in Numbers chapter 1, you had one man who was over each tribe. He was basically responsible for the families of that tribe. Now when you get to Numbers chapter 2, God is ordering the positions of the tribes around the tabernacle.

And there's an interesting thing that comes about. When you read Numbers chapter 2, it will give the prince or the tribe and then it will say, "and his host." That is, and his army. Thus, you're going to find then that each tribe was made up of a number of little smaller armies. In other words, these family armies, so to speak, these clans, which I will show you just momentarily, would be able to fight on their own. They would be able to fight individually. But whenever they needed a larger number, then all the clans would come together. You even saw this when the children of Israel went into Canaan land, because each tribe was responsible to conquer his piece of land that had been given to them. And so Judah would say to Simeon, you come go with me and help me and then I'll come go with you and help you. So obviously they were able to fight individually, independently, but when a larger group was needed, they would always combine together. Now, moreover, you're going to find that each tribe not only had a head or a captain, had a prince, each tribe was made up of smaller armies.

Let me show you. Look in Numbers chapter 10 if you would. Numbers chapter 10. And look at verse 14. Numbers 10 verse 14. Watch carefully. Numbers 10 verse 14.

Scripture Reading — Numbers 10:14-25
"And in the first place, what the standard of the camp of the children of Judah, according to their armies."

So now, wait a minute, we've got one tribe, the tribe of Judah, that happens to be made up of many armies, "and over his host," that is over the whole army, "was Nahshon, the son of Amminadab." Note, if you would, "over their armies." Skip down to verse 18. "And the standard of the camp of Reuben set forward, according to their armies," plural.

Scripture Reading — Numbers 10:14-25
"And over his host was Elizur, the son of Shedeur."

Now, so note if you would, again, here's the tribe of Reuben, but note it says, "their armies" as well. Look in verse 22. "And the standard of the camp of the children of Ephraim set forward, according to their armies, and over his host was Elishama, the son of Ammihud." Note, so the point I'm trying to make is this.

There were numerous armies that made up the tribal army. If you look in verse 25, "and the standard of the camp of the children of Dan set forward, which was the rereward of all the camps throughout their hosts," their armies, "and over his hosts," that is, the headman over the army of the children of Dan, "was Ahiezer, the son of Ammishaddai." So, you're going to find that although there was a tribal head, there were family heads, there were family clans. These were independent militias as we would call them. Now, if you will turn to Numbers chapter 26, I think that this will be made even clearer. So let me say it again. Let me try to explain it. You had one prince who was over the tribe. But in that tribe, you had many armies because you had independent families which were independent militias. So if you look in Numbers chapter 26 and verse 2, he says, "take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel from 20 years old and upward throughout their fathers'" plural "house, all that are able to go to war in Israel." OK, take the number throughout their fathers' house. Now if you would, let's get down to verse 4. Watch carefully. Remember Jacob had twelve sons, but these armies are not just for the twelve sons. It goes even farther. Note if you would, verse 4. He says, "take the sum of the people from twenty years old and upward as the Lord commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt." Now watch, "Reuben, the eldest son of Israel, the children of Reuben."

So, now we're in just the tribe of Reuben. You have "Hanoch, of whom come of the family of the Hanochites, of Pallu, the father of the Palluites, of Hezron, the family of the Hezronites, of Carmi, the family of the Carmites." So, these are all children of Reuben. And now they're all families, and they have a head, and they have their own little militia, their own little army. He says in verse 7, "these are the families of the Reubenites, and the number of them were 43,730." So out of all these different families, when you combine the number of men who were able to fight, you had 43,730. Wow. Well, here's another illustration. He says in verse 7, "these are the family of the Reubenites who were numbered, of them 43,730, and the sons of Pallu, Eliab, and the sons of Eliab, Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. This is that Dathan and Abiram which were famous in the congregation who strove against Moses and against Aaron and the company of Korah when they strove against the Lord," etc., etc.

Note, if you would, though, each one of these families happen to be named as a part of the tribe of Reuben. So once again, you have one prince over the whole tribe, but then it is broken down as well. Israel did not have a professional army. What they had was a militia. A militia normally consists of non-professional soldiers, citizens of a nation, citizens of a state, citizens of a family, citizens of a family clan who can be called together for military service in the time of need as opposed to a professional standing full-time army.

Biblical and Historical Support for Militias

Weaver argues that the Bible supports militias, and the founding fathers feared standing armies; he quotes George Mason, Richard Henry Lee, and John Pomeroy on the Second Amendment.

Let me ask you a question. Since I've showed you this from the book of Numbers and from out the Old Testament, how does this apply to us today? I mean, how should these truths affect us? Well, historically, militias have always provided their own weaponry. They provided their own training. Because they were interested in self-defense, interested in defending their families, their communities, and their societies.

Now, let me point something out. Biblically speaking, the Bible is for militias. Historically speaking, our nation was built upon militias. The founding fathers were very frightened of a standing army. What did they just come through? They fought the largest standing army in Europe, the army of King George. And have you ever stopped to think about this? Without a standing army, you cannot have perpetual wars.

Now, let me put it to you differently. If you have militias, you cannot have perpetual wars. Now we have a standing army in this country. Our president happens to be the commander in chief, or at least supposed to be the commander in chief. And if he tells the army, you go fight in Afghanistan, that's where they go. You go to fight in Iraq, that's where they go. You go to fight in Vietnam, that's where they go. But since militias were made up of the people, if the President says, we want to go to Afghanistan and fight over there, the militia says, whoa, wait a minute. What do we have to do with Afghanistan?

What have they done to us? Are they attacking us? No. Do we have any interest over there? No. Well, until they bother us, we're not bothering them. Bye. We're not going to fight. You see the difference? So if you have a standing army, you can have perpetual warfare. If you don't have a standing army, you can't have perpetual warfare.

Now, here's an interesting thought. And I would really like for especially each one of you who happen to have a birth certificate to check your birth certificate. I don't know if the recent ones do this or not, but since Alice and I are over 21, I looked at our birth certificates. Did you know that each state had military districts in it? And the reason it had military districts is because of the militia. I looked at my birth certificate and according to my birth certificate, I was born in the Militia District 1529. Alice was born in a different county and she was born in the Militia District of 1537. Now, how did our birth certificates come up with a Militia District? And the answer is, because according to federal law, anyone, any male particularly, from the age of 17 to 45 is in an unorganized militia.

Now, I'm going to read it to you. Here it is. Title 10, United States Code, section 311. Militia. Composition and classes. "Militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males, at least 17 years of age, and, except as provided in Section 313 of Title 32, under 45 years of age, who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become citizens of the United States, and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. B. The classes of the militia are, number one, the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the naval militia, and two, the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the naval militia." So, if you were born in America, and you're not in the National Guard, you're not in naval militia, if you're from age 17 to 45 and you're a man, you're in the unorganized militia. And so, that's why originally our birth certificate then had which militia district you were born in.

Now, our founding fathers did not trust standing armies. They did not trust a professional army. In fact, when George Washington fought, it was a volunteer army. Now, I want to give you six quotes. I could give you quotes as long as my arm, but I want to just give you six from George Mason, Richard Henry Lee, and John Pomeroy. George Mason, by the way, he was one of the ones who helped write the Fairfax Resolves. George Mason said, "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." Here's another quote. He says, "A well-regulated militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state."

"That standing armies in the time of peace should be avoided as dangerous to liberty and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to and governed by civil power." Here's a third quote. "When the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, Sir William Keith, who was the governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people, that it was the best and most effective way to enslave them." "But they should not do it openly, but to weaken them and let them sink gradually by totally disusing and neglecting the militia." Here's Richard Henry Lee. "Whereas to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them. Nor does it follow from this that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia or a standing army must be influenced by a truly anti-Republican principle."

"And when we see many men disposed to practice upon it whenever they can prevail, no wonder true Republicans are for carefully guarding against it." And then he says this, Richard Henry Lee, "The militias when properly formed are in fact the people themselves, and include all men capable of bearing arms. To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." Now, one last quote. This is from John Norton Pomeroy. John Norton Pomeroy was born in 1828. He died in 1885. He was an American lawyer, a legal writer, and a constitutionalist, and he wrote this on the Second Amendment. "The object of this clause, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, is to secure a well-armed militia. But a militia would be useless unless the citizens were able to exercise themselves in the use of war-like weapons. To preserve this privilege and to secure to the people the ability to oppose themselves in a military force against the usurpations of government, as well as against enemies from without, that government is forbidden by any law or proceeding to invade or destroy the right to keep and bear arms." Wow. So he said, no government has the right to violate the Second Amendment.

Now, I want you to go back in your Bibles to Numbers chapter 1. I did not tell you all that just to fill time. I told you that because it has a great impact upon what I'm trying to share with you. Now, I want you to look at Numbers 1 and verse 16. Verse 16 actually refers to verses 5 through 15, where the twelve princes were chosen to lead the twelve tribes. Verse 16, "These were the renowned of the congregation, princes of the tribes of their fathers, heads of thousands in Israel."

The Pastor as a Renowned Leader and Trainer

The word 'renowned' in Numbers 1:16 means called out and appointed; pastors are similarly lifted up and have authority to rule over and train the congregation.

When you and I think of the word renown, we think differently from the biblical term. I could say that James is renowned for eating M&M's. Everybody knows he likes M&M's. He's famous for that, okay? That's how we think of the word renown. Somebody's famous for something, you know. But that's not what this word means. The Hebrew word here is the word qara, and it literally means one that is called out, one that is lifted up, one that is named, one that is commissioned, one that is appointed, one that is endowed, or one that is chosen. So, He then lists the names of all of these that were chosen, lifted up, and appointed, and ordained.

Now, let me just point several things out in order to make a real application here. First of all, when you think of the training that is to be done in the home, the husband and the father is biblically the appointed head of the house. That means the husband has the duty and responsibility to teach and train the wife. The father has the duty and responsibility to teach and train the children. I'm not going to re-preach those two messages on the biblical doctrine of self-defense, at least not now. And I'm certainly not going to preach that 15-part series I did on the biblical doctrine of war, at least not now. But I'm just simply saying it is primarily the father's responsibility to teach and to train his children and the husband's responsibility to teach and train the wife. How will the wife learn if the husband will not teach? How will the children learn if the father will not teach? Now, I understand that not every father knows everything and not every husband knows everything. I understand that.

And one may lawfully and legitimately ask for help if he really truly needs help. But yet the primary responsibility goes upon the father and the husband in the home. Secondly, you'd have to ask this. What about grown children? What about children whose parents happen to be dead, or parents happen to be divorced, and they've never been trained, they know absolutely nothing about weaponry, they've never been taught. And by the way, let me mention this. Do you know why God left some of the enemies alive in the land of Canaan when the children of Israel went and possessed it? Let me show you. Look in your Bibles to the book of Judges chapter 3. After the book of Joshua, you've got the book of Judges, Judges chapter 3. Look if you would please at the first three verses. Judges chapter 3, verses 1 through 3. Watch. Watch this carefully. Judges 3, verses 1 through 3. "Now these are the nations which the Lord left, to prove Israel by them, even as many of Israel as had not known all the wars of Canaan." So there were some children that were too young to fight. Moreover, there were children born after the conquest of Canaan who never knew anything about fighting. So he says, "even as many of Israel as had not known all the wars of Canaan, only that the generations of the children of Israel might know," watch, "to teach them war, at the least such as before knew nothing thereof."

"And here's some that he left just to teach him to fight, namely the five lords of the Philistines, and all the Canaanites, and the Sidonians, and the Hivites that dwell in Mount Lebanon from Mount Baal Hermon unto the entering of Hamath." Now God said, I left these enemies just so your children who never experienced fighting, they might learn how to fight. Wow! Isn't that amazing? And let me tell you something else that you might find surprising. Did you know that God's people are called His battle axe and His weapons of war? You'll find that in Jeremiah chapter 51 and verse 20, where God says, "Thou art my battle axe and weapons of war, for with thee will I break in pieces the nations, and with thee will I destroy kingdoms." So God refers to his people as his battle-axe and his weapons of war.

Now, let me get back to the word renowned in Numbers 1 and verse 16. I pointed out that the word renowned meant those who were called out, those who were commissioned, those who were lifted up, those who were appointed. So these words, which I'm going to show you, not only apply to the princes that were listed in Numbers chapter one, they also apply to pastors. Now, if you have my book on the Christian civil government, you can read the seventh chapter on the pastor as a magistrate, and you will see that a pastor is a spiritual magistrate who is equal and actually in one sense the word higher than a civil magistrate, but he is still a magistrate. The same word is used. So a God called and ordained and appointed pastor is one that has been endowed with gifts, he's been chosen, he's been commissioned by God, and he's one that has been lifted up and recognized by the congregation.

So I could say it like this. Why is it that we come here every week that I preach? Why is David not preaching every week? Or Steve not preaching every week? You see what I'm saying? You're saying, well, God hasn't called me to that. God hasn't chosen me to that. And nobody here would listen to me. Nobody would want me as a pastor. Well, I understand that. But all I'm trying to show you just momentarily is this: that a pastor, a real godly pastor, is someone that has been lifted up out of the congregation, and listen carefully, he's put over the congregation.

Now let me explain something. I want you to turn in your Bibles, first of all, to 1 Thessalonians chapter 5. 1 Thessalonians chapter 5. Watch carefully, because there are several words that we're going to see several times. Look in First Thessalonians, chapter 5, and notice if you would please, verse 12. First Thessalonians 5, verse 12. So Paul is writing these Thessalonian Christians and he says this, "And we beseech you, brethren, to know them which labor among you."

So he's talking about the pastors. "Know them which labor among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you. And esteem them very highly, and love for their works, that ye may be at peace among yourselves." Now, the apostle says, you must know them which labor among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you. Well, who does the admonishing? It's the pastor. It's the preacher. And he points out the fact that we are over you. Now, let me explain that. That does not mean that somehow I am an exalted individual, or any pastor is an exalted individual, when it comes to what you and I would call equality. In this sense of the word, the preacher, the pastor, just like anybody else and everybody else, is equally the creature of God. He is equally a sinner. He may equally be redeemed by God. But just because we have equal standing before God does not mean that we are positionally the same. Okay? Husbands and wives are equal before God. But God has constituted the husband as the head of the house. So they may be equal as far as being creatures and sinners and being redeemed and have equal standing before God, but positionally they are different. It's the same way with an employer and an employee. You're both creatures, you're both sinners, you may be both Christians, but the employer is positionally different than the employee. You follow that?

So, this is why he's saying, "Esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake, and be at peace among yourselves." By beseeching you, he said, by beseeching that you know them which labor among you and are over you in the Lord. Now let me show it to you again. Look in your Bibles to the book of Hebrews chapter 13. Right before the book of James, Hebrews James. Look in Hebrews chapter 13 and notice if you would please verse 17. Hebrews 13 and verse 17. Look what He says again. Hebrews 13 verse 17. "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves, for they watch for your souls."

"As they that must give an account, that they may do it with joy, not with grief, for that is unprofitable for you." Now again, he says, "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves." Now, what that means is this, as long as I am telling you what is right biblically and scripturally, as long as I'm telling you what God demands, God says you must submit. Why? Because I watch for your souls. And then notice he said this, "as they that must give an account, that they may do it with joy, not with grief, for that is unprofitable for you." So on the judgment day, I will give an account, not only for my preaching and teaching, but I will also give an account to how people listened, how people responded. So if I have to say to the Lord, "Lord, that Steve was as hard-headed as a solid rock."

"He wouldn't listen to me. I couldn't get him to do what's right for anything." God said, that's going to be unprofitable for him. It'll be a grief for me to say that. But on the other hand, if I say, "Lord, Steve was a wonderful, obedient child of God. He listened, he obeyed, he applied." I can say that with joy, and that's going to be to his benefit.

So this is what he's saying. "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves, for they watch over your souls, as they that must give an account, that may do it with joy, not with grief, for that is unprofitable for you." Now skip down to verse 24. He says it again. "Salute all them that have the rule over you, and all the saints. They of Italy salute you." Salute all of them that have the rule over you. That is, always be willing to speak.

Now, obviously, if someone has the rule over you, he's someone that has been chosen, someone that has been lifted up, someone who's been endowed with gifts, someone who has been appointed, and he's someone who's recognized by the congregation. He's someone who's able and apt to teach. He's the under-shepherd, and as the under-shepherd, he's accountable and responsible to the great shepherd and the chief shepherd and the good shepherd. And therefore, he should be able not only to teach, but also to train. Let me give you another verse. In Isaiah 41 and verse 15, listen to what God said. God said,

Scripture Reading — Isaiah 41:15
"Behold, I will make thee a sharp, threshing instrument, having teeth. Thou shalt thresh the mountains, and beat them small, and shalt make the hills as chaff."

So the truth is that every individual should understand the doctrine of self-defense. Every family should understand the biblical doctrine of self-defense. Every community should understand the biblical doctrine of self-defense.

The Duty to Train and Defend

Weaver stresses that it is morally wrong not to resist evil; families and churches must be trained in self-defense, and pastors should lead in this training.

And just because someone has a weapon, and someone has a concealed carry permit does not mean that that person can use that weapon effectively, nor does it mean that he knows how to use it and when to use it, nor does it mean that he can function under pressure and under stress. I just read this week about the number of churches now that have protection teams. And the highest percentage was churches having protection teams, and then some were hiring private security guards, and some were even hiring police. But by far the higher number was those who have protection teams. And I've often said, most of these protection teams can't shoot. I would hate to be in a building where there was an active shooter or an invasion and you had somebody with weapons there who were not trained and could not shoot straight.

Usually what's going to happen, a number of innocent people are going to be shot in such incidents. It cannot help but be innocent bystanders. It's just like the shooting out in Texas. If you watch the video that's been on the internet, John Correa doing the active self-protection video, he shows the one guy who took the bad guy out, but other men were running around muzzling people with their weapon as they were running around. I'm just simply saying, you've got to understand that just because someone has a protection team does not mean that that team can actually function.

So I could ask you this. Can your family function as a team? Can your church function as a team? Can your community function as a team? How in the world will a community defend itself against gangs and hoodlums and intruders if you can't function together? What about a societal collapse? Who will lead you? Who will train you? And the answer should come back: It should be the pastors.

That was the truth in the first war for independence. That was the truth in the second war for independence. Because the pastors and the under-shepherd, he's been lifted up. You say, well, as a pastor, I don't know how to shoot. I don't know how to drive. Well, you can learn. You learn a lot of other things. Everybody starts at the same point. Let me give you a quote.

I want you to listen to this. I want you to think very seriously on this quote. This was by Dr. Norman Geisler. He was in a life and death debate, debating the moral issues of our time. And here is what he said. "To permit murder when one could have prevented it is morally wrong. To allow rape when one could have hindered it is an evil. To watch an act of cruelty to children without trying to intervene is morally inexcusable. In brief, not resisting evil is an evil of omission, and an evil of omission can be just as evil as an evil of commission. Any man who refuses to protect his wife and children against a violent intruder fails them morally." Well, if you have a duty to protect, and you do, you also have a duty to train to protect. You also have a duty to make sure that you're able to defend your family. If it's morally and biblically wrong to allow murder, rape, and physical harm, one must be ready and able to hinder and prevent it.

And the only way to do so is to be trained in self-defense. It is impossible to love your neighbor as yourself if you're not willing to protect him, if you're not willing to fight for him. It's the good shepherd who gives his life for the sheep. And if an earthly shepherd is a good shepherd, he will train to defend the sheep that God has entrusted to him. He will also train the sheep to defend themselves. A hireling will flee. A hireling is not really interested in protecting the sheep. He's not interested in laying down his life. He's not interested in anything but the money. But you have seen from Scripture, a shepherd like David is someone who not only knows how to fight, he's prepared to fight and he's willing to fight. And like David, a real shepherd believes in obedience, in faith and in fighting.

Let me just give you very quickly another thought or two. And I must hasten to remind you that what you were able to do 20 and 40 years ago does not apply today. Times change. People change. Weaponry changes. And above all, our understanding should change, but it should change for the better as we age. We cannot depend upon what we used to do. I wish I had kept the number of how many men that told me, "But Pastor, I shot expert when I was in the army." Yeah, you did. Forty years ago. May I remind you, you cannot now do what you used to do. We must soberly and seriously assess ourselves and our abilities and our training. You cannot move as you did then.

Your eyesight is not as good as it was back then. Your mind has forgotten many principles. Your reflexes are much slower. Let's be honest. If you fail to train, there's no way in the world today at 60 or 70, you're going to defend your family. You're just not going to do it. I want you to listen to what Teddy Roosevelt said. "The great body of our citizens shoot less as time goes on."

"We should encourage rifle practice among schoolboys, and indeed among all classes, as well as in the military services, by every means in our power. Thus, and not otherwise, may we be able to assist in preserving peace in the world. In the direction of preparation to avert war, if possible, and to be fit for war, if it should come, is to teach men how to shoot." One other quote, Thomas Jefferson. He said, "A strong body makes a strong mind. As to the species of exercise, I advise a gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind." "Now listen to this, games played with a ball and others of that nature are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion to your walks." Isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing? We're living in a dangerous time. We're living in a time when our land is being invaded on every hand by people who think it's their duty to kill us. I have a friend who puts something in his bulletin just about every Sunday, and I want to read to you what he puts in his church bulletin. Think about this. He puts in the bulletin, "Murder is illegal. Attempting murder is illegal. A felon owning a gun is illegal. Shooting people indiscriminately is illegal. Using firearms in a criminal manner is illegal. Criminals do not go through background checks when purchasing illegal guns. Explain how criminals will follow new laws. Explain how new laws will make us safer. Explain how restricting law-abiding citizens even more will make us safer." Oh, you can't.

Conclusion: The Call to Be Armed and Trained

Citing Jefferson and a church bulletin, Weaver concludes that in dangerous times, Christians must be armed and trained to protect themselves and others, following the example of Pastor Jonas Clark.

He said, "A strong body makes a strong mind. As to the species of exercise, I advise a gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind." "Now listen to this, games played with a ball and others of that nature are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion to your walks." Isn't that amazing? Isn't that amazing? We're living in a dangerous time. We're living in a time when our land is being invaded on every hand by people who think it's their duty to kill us. I have a friend who puts something in his bulletin just about every Sunday, and I want to read to you what he puts in his church bulletin. Think about this. He puts in the bulletin, "Murder is illegal. Attempting murder is illegal. A felon owning a gun is illegal. Shooting people indiscriminately is illegal. Using firearms in a criminal manner is illegal. Criminals do not go through background checks when purchasing illegal guns. Explain how criminals will follow new laws. Explain how new laws will make us safer. Explain how restricting law-abiding citizens even more will make us safer." Oh, you can't.

"Then your argument is invalid." And then he ends with this. "Were you armed in church this Sunday?" You have to remember something. It is your duty first and foremost to protect yourself and your family and your neighbor if you love him as yourself. I would fight for Effie just as quickly as I would fight for my wife. But James is responsible for Effie now. You see? I would fight for Sharon. But Ron is responsible for Sharon. Do you follow that? How in the world are we going to defend ourselves and our family? So here it is. How can you overcome a stronger, more powerful, and more numerous enemy without being armed and without being trained?

This is why when Sam Adams and John Hancock asked Pastor Jonas Clark, "Would his men fight?" And he answered, "They will fight. For this very hour I trained them. They will fight, and they will die if need be." And the next day he had to perform eight funerals for the men who died in the shadow of the church on Lexington Green. He will make sure the sheep are safe because He's concerned for their lives and He wants them to be protected. Father, in the name of Jesus Christ, we bow to Thee this day. We thank You for Your Word. We thank You for Your truth. We ask, Lord, that You would help us, lead us, guide us, and direct us. May Your will be accomplished in our lives. In the name of Jesus Christ, we ask and pray. Amen.


Study Guide

Major Themes

The Shepherd as Protector and Fighter

Summary: A true shepherd, unlike a hireling, is willing to fight and lay down his life for the sheep, as exemplified by David and ultimately Christ.

Evidence: Weaver states, 'Shepherds by nature must be fighters because there are wolves, there are bears, there are lions...' and references David's fight with the lion and bear.

God as a Warrior and Organizer of Armies

Summary: God is depicted as a man of war who musters His people into armies, as seen in the Exodus and the book of Numbers.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'The Lord is a man of war... God brought them out in a military order' and explains the mustering in Numbers 1.

The Biblical and Historical Legitimacy of Militias

Summary: The Bible supports a militia system over a standing army, and America's founding fathers strongly advocated for a well-regulated militia.

Evidence: Weaver quotes George Mason: 'A well-regulated militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state.'

The Pastor's Authority and Responsibility to Train

Summary: Pastors are appointed leaders who must rule over and train their congregations, including in physical self-defense, as part of their shepherding duty.

Evidence: Weaver cites 1 Thessalonians 5:12 and Hebrews 13:17 to show pastors are 'over you in the Lord' and must be obeyed, and applies this to training for defense.

The Moral Imperative of Self-Defense

Summary: It is morally wrong to allow evil when one could prevent it; therefore, individuals and families have a duty to be trained and ready to defend.

Evidence: Weaver quotes Norman Geisler: 'To permit murder when one could have prevented it is morally wrong... Any man who refuses to protect his wife and children against a violent intruder fails them morally.'

Key Arguments

Shepherds must be fighters, not hirelings

Summary: The distinction in John 10 shows that a true shepherd actively protects the sheep, even at the cost of his life, unlike a hireling who flees.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'It is the shepherd who always protects the sheep and is willing to give his life for the sheep.'

God's people are organized for war

Summary: The book of Numbers demonstrates that God mustered Israel into armies by tribes and families, establishing a militia system.

Evidence: Weaver explains, 'There were numerous armies that made up the tribal army... These were independent militias as we would call them.'

Standing armies enable perpetual war; militias prevent it

Summary: A professional standing army can be sent to fight anywhere, but a militia of citizens will only fight when directly threatened.

Evidence: Weaver argues, 'If you have a standing army, you can have perpetual warfare. If you don't have a standing army, you can't have perpetual warfare.'

The Second Amendment secures the militia and the right to self-defense

Summary: Historical quotes show that the right to bear arms is intended to maintain a well-armed militia and protect against tyranny.

Evidence: Weaver quotes John Pomeroy: 'The object of this clause... is to secure a well-armed militia... to oppose themselves in a military force against the usurpations of government.'

Pastors are appointed leaders who must train the flock

Summary: As those 'over you in the Lord,' pastors have a duty to teach and train their congregations in all areas, including self-defense.

Evidence: Weaver states, 'A God called and ordained and appointed pastor is one that has been endowed with gifts... he's put over the congregation.'

Failure to train is a moral failure

Summary: If one has a duty to protect, one also has a duty to train; neglecting this is an evil of omission.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'If you have a duty to protect, and you do, you also have a duty to train to protect.'

Scripture References

John 10:11-15

Context: Introduction to the series, contrasting the good shepherd who lays down his life with the hireling who flees.

1 Samuel 17:34-37

Context: David recounts fighting a lion and a bear to protect his sheep, illustrating the shepherd as fighter.

Proverbs 28:15-16

Context: A wicked ruler is compared to a roaring lion and a ranging bear, oppressing the poor.

Psalm 94:20-21

Context: The throne of iniquity frames mischief by law and condemns innocent blood, showing governmental wickedness.

Proverbs 28:28

Context: When the wicked rise, men hide themselves; when they perish, the righteous increase.

Proverbs 29:2

Context: When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; when the wicked rule, the people mourn.

1 Samuel 17:45

Context: David confronts Goliath in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel.

Exodus 13:18

Context: Israel went up harnessed (in battle array) out of Egypt, showing God's military organization.

Exodus 15:1-6

Context: The song of Moses declares the Lord is a man of war who triumphed over Pharaoh's army.

Numbers 1:1-4

Context: God commands Moses to number all males able to go to war by their armies and tribes.

Numbers 1:44-46

Context: The total number of fighting men was 603,550, indicating a large militia force.

Numbers 10:14-25

Context: The tribes set forward according to their armies, with each tribe composed of multiple armies.

Numbers 26:2-7

Context: The numbering by fathers' houses shows the family-based militia structure within tribes.

Numbers 1:16

Context: The princes were renowned (called out, appointed) heads of thousands in Israel.

Judges 3:1-3

Context: God left enemies in Canaan to teach the new generations of Israelites how to fight.

Jeremiah 51:20

Context: God calls His people His battle axe and weapons of war to break in pieces nations.

1 Thessalonians 5:12-13

Context: Believers are to know and esteem those who labor among them and are over them in the Lord.

Hebrews 13:17, 24

Context: Obey those who rule over you, for they watch for your souls and must give an account.

Isaiah 41:15

Context: God will make His people a sharp threshing instrument to thresh mountains, implying strength in battle.

Historical References

War for Independence (American Revolution)

Context: Weaver mentions pastors in the 17th and 18th centuries who were active in preaching and standing for liberty.

Second War for Independence (War of 1812)

Context: Referred to as the 'War of Northern Aggression' by Weaver, noting pastors' involvement.

George Mason

Context: Quoted on the militia being the whole people and the proper defense of a free state.

Sir William Keith

Context: Advised the British Parliament to disarm the American people gradually by neglecting the militia.

Richard Henry Lee

Context: Argued that to preserve liberty, the whole body of the people must possess arms and be trained.

John Norton Pomeroy

Context: 19th-century constitutionalist who wrote that the Second Amendment secures a well-armed militia against government usurpation.

Teddy Roosevelt

Context: Quoted encouraging rifle practice among all classes to preserve peace and prepare for war.

Thomas Jefferson

Context: Advised using a gun for exercise to give boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind.

Pastor Jonas Clark

Context: When asked if his men would fight at Lexington, he replied they would fight and die if need be, having trained them.

Important Quotes

I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.

Significance: Central verse of the sermon, establishing the contrast between the sacrificial shepherd and the hireling.

The Lord is a man of war. The Lord is his name.

Significance: Key declaration that God is a warrior, supporting the theme that His people are to be organized for battle.

A well-regulated militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state.

Significance: George Mason's quote used to argue for the biblical and historical basis of militias over standing armies.

To permit murder when one could have prevented it is morally wrong. To allow rape when one could have hindered it is an evil. To watch an act of cruelty to children without trying to intervene is morally inexcusable.

Significance: Norman Geisler's quote emphasizing the moral duty to resist evil, foundational to the call for self-defense training.

They will fight. For this very hour I trained them. They will fight, and they will die if need be.

Significance: Pastor Jonas Clark's words exemplify the ideal shepherd who prepares his flock for physical defense.

Discussion Questions

How does the distinction between a hireling and a shepherd in John 10 apply to modern pastoral ministry?

Context: Weaver emphasizes that a true shepherd protects and fights for the sheep, unlike a hireling who flees.

In what ways does the military organization of Israel in Numbers inform our understanding of church and family defense today?

Context: Weaver details the tribal and family militia structure, suggesting it as a model for modern application.

What are the dangers of a standing army compared to a militia, according to Weaver and the founding fathers?

Context: Weaver argues that standing armies enable perpetual war, while militias are defensive and liberty-preserving.

How should the biblical command to 'obey them that have the rule over you' be balanced with individual responsibility in self-defense?

Context: Weaver uses Hebrews 13:17 to argue that pastors have authority to train and lead the congregation in defense.

Is it morally obligatory for Christians to be trained in self-defense? Why or why not?

Context: Weaver quotes Norman Geisler to assert that failing to prevent evil is morally wrong, implying a duty to train.

What role should the local church play in preparing its members for physical threats or societal collapse?

Context: Weaver suggests that pastors and churches should lead in training, as seen in the example of Pastor Jonas Clark.

Applications

Pastors must lead in training for defense

Summary: Pastors, as under-shepherds, should take responsibility to train their congregations in self-defense, just as they teach spiritual truths.

Evidence: Weaver says, 'It should be the pastors' who lead and train, citing the example of Pastor Jonas Clark.

Fathers are responsible to train their families

Summary: The head of the household has a biblical duty to teach and train his wife and children in self-defense.

Evidence: Weaver states, 'The husband and the father is biblically the appointed head of the house... to teach and train.'

Churches should form and train protection teams

Summary: Given the rise in church shootings, congregations should have trained protection teams rather than relying on untrained individuals.

Evidence: Weaver notes, 'Most of these protection teams can't shoot' and stresses the need for effective training.

Individuals must assess and maintain their defensive abilities

Summary: Aging and changing circumstances require ongoing training; past proficiency does not guarantee current capability.

Evidence: Weaver warns, 'You cannot now do what you used to do... If you fail to train, there's no way... you're going to defend your family.'

Be armed and ready to protect others

Summary: Loving your neighbor as yourself includes being willing and able to defend them from violent attack.

Evidence: Weaver asks, 'Were you armed in church this Sunday?' and emphasizes the duty to protect family and neighbors.

deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | clean_readable_transcript | 2026-06-06T00:40:53Z

deepseek | deepseek-v4-pro | weaver_study | 2026-06-06T15:04:20Z